euroref — European government reference data

Statutory filing deadlines

get_filing_deadlines

Read-onlyIdempotent

PAID ($0.003, same as any series). Recurring statutory tax deadlines for a country — VAT/GST returns and payments, PAYE/payroll withholding remittances, corporate income tax returns and provisional/instalment payments — as RULES, each cited to the official source with the verbatim phrase that states it, plus the actual DUE DATES in a window, rolled for the country's weekend and national public holidays (every skipped day is listed). Where a rule's source does not say which way a weekend deadline moves, the date is flagged roll_unverified rather than guessed. Countries or taxes we could not verify are returned as a free coverage_gap with reasons, never invented. Pass year_end (MM-DD) to re-anchor corporate-tax rules on the company's own accounting year end. The HTML page /{country}/filing-deadlines shows the rules free. Every DE series is free to try. After a 200, bind get_changes (free poll) or register_alert (HMAC push; Register: $0 · Delivery after trial: $0.05) on this series so a later gazette does not silently retire the value.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`to`	No	Window end, YYYY-MM-DD. Default from + 365 days; at most 400 days after from
`tax`	No	Only this tax's rules and dates
`from`	No	Window start, YYYY-MM-DD. Default today
`api_key`	No	API key (bypasses x402; metered for invoicing)
`country`	Yes	ISO country code
`year_end`	No	Company accounting year end, MM-DD (e.g. 06-30). Applies to rules marked year_end_variable

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`gaps`	No
`unit`	No
`error`	No	Present on a free refusal or error; no charge
`notes`	No
`stale`	No
`value`	No	The rules. Each carries its own source {name, url, anchor} and last_confirmed
`series`	No
`source`	No
`status`	No	On a coverage gap: researched_no_verified_rule or not_yet_researched
`country`	No
`due_dates`	No	Computed occurrences in the window, sorted by due_date
`no_charge`	No
`price_usd`	No
`confidence`	No
`disclaimer`	No
`how_to_pay`	No
`bind_series`	No
`explanation`	No
`label_basis`	No	Inputs and the rule ids that produced the two labels
`x_next_bind`	No
`coverage_gaps`	No	Taxes in scope with no verified rule for this country, and why
`http_endpoint`	No
`coverage_label`	No	How much of the question is covered: ready = complete; partial = held with a disclosed limitation or default; gap = no number served. Rules at /label-rules
`effective_from`	No
`last_confirmed`	No
`confidence_label`	No	Evidence verdict derived from source type, verification age and the stale flag (answers: the weakest series read). Rules at /label-rules
`payment_required`	No	true when the call needs payment; how_to_pay explains x402 or card
`computed_disclaimer`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed4 schema fields changedOct 17, 2026
- removedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / source_type / anyOf
```
Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / source_type / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / verification_age_days / anyOf
```
Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "number"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]
```
- addedOutput schema / properties / label_basis / properties / verification_age_days / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "number",
+  "null"
+]
```
AddedOct 13, 2026

TDQS

A4.5/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive and closed-world, so the bar is low, yet the description adds substantial nuance: weekend/holiday rolling with every skipped day listed, a roll_unverified flag instead of guessing direction, and coverage_gap entries for unverifiable countries/taxes. Pricing and the change-tracking workflow are also disclosed. This is unusually rich behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The substantive content is dense and useful, but the description is front-loaded with a pricing note and padded with cross-sell copy (get_changes poll, register_alert HMAC push with two price points, the free HTML page). Those sentences serve commerce more than tool selection, so the structure is not tight even though little is factually wrong.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 6-parameter tool with an output schema, the description covers what an agent needs: output shape (rules with verbatim citations plus dated deadlines), uncertainty handling (roll_unverified, coverage_gap), and the effect of the key optional parameter. Nothing essential about calling it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description adds meaning by explaining what year_end actually does (re-anchors corporate-tax rules on the company's own accounting year end) rather than just naming the field. It does not, however, clarify from/to defaults or the 400-day cap beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource and enumerates exactly what is returned: VAT/GST returns and payments, PAYE remittances, CIT returns and instalments, delivered as cited rules plus rolled due dates. That is clearly distinguishable from siblings like get_public_holidays or compute_vat. The only dilution is the leading pricing note, but the purpose is unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete context for the optional parameters (year_end to re-anchor corporate-tax rules, tax to narrow to one regime) and points to a free HTML alternative for the rules. It also suggests binding get_changes/register_alert after a 200. What it lacks is any explicit exclusion – e.g. when this is the wrong tool versus get_calendar or the individual compute_* tax tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All euroref — European government reference data tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?