euroref — European government reference data

get_calendar

Read-onlyIdempotent

FREE, unmetered. GET /v1/calendar for this brand's continent. Optional country (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2) and series. Derives reverify_by from last_confirmed + update_cycle_days (the same window that sets stale) and, only when current.effective_to is a non-empty string, next_effective_known with basis effective_to. status unknown omits that date. Never parses notes. Does not invent MPC, budget, or wage-review dates. next_effective_known is the recorded end of the current value, not a promised gazette event. A 402 is a gate bug — do not pay. Past changes stay on get_changes.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`series`	No	Optional series id (for example policy-rate). Omit for every series. A valid country with no match stays free.
`country`	No	Optional ISO 3166-1 alpha-2. Omit for every series on this brand's continent. Unknown to the catalog is 404 free. Not two letters is 400 free.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`as_of`	No
`brand`	No
`count`	No
`error`	No	Present on a free refusal or error; no charge
`entries`	No
`no_charge`	No
`price_usd`	No
`disclaimer`	No
`how_to_pay`	No
`bind_series`	No
`explanation`	No
`x_next_bind`	No
`http_endpoint`	No
`payment_required`	No	true when the call needs payment; how_to_pay explains x402 or card

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedOct 12, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "description": "Derived reverify_by and next_effective_known dates",
+  "properties": {
+    "as_of": {},
+    "bind_series": {},
+    "brand": {},
+    "count": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "disclaimer": {},
+    "entries": {
+      "items": {},
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "error": {
+      "description": "Present on a free refusal or error; no charge"
+    },
+    "explanation": {},
+    "how_to_pay": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "http_endpoint": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "no_charge": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "payment_required": {
+      "description": "true when the call needs payment; how_to_pay explains x402 or card",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "price_usd": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "x_next_bind": {}
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

AddedSep 26, 2026

TDQS

A4/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, openWorld, non-destructive), yet the description adds substantial context beyond them: no metering/cost, 400/404 responses are free, and a 402 is flagged as a gate bug that should not be paid. It also exposes derivation rules (reverify_by from last_confirmed + update_cycle_days), the conditional emission of next_effective_known, and anti-hallucination guarantees (never parses notes, does not invent MPC/budget/wage-review dates).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Cost and endpoint are sensibly front-loaded, but the text then runs into a dense stream of caveats with undefined jargon (last_confirmed, update_cycle_days, stale, MPC) that assumes prior knowledge, harming readability. Several clauses are genuinely useful, but the run-on construction and internal shorthand could be tightened.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be re-explained, yet the description still covers derived fields, conditional omissions, error-code economics, and where historical data lives. The main omission is a plain statement of what the calendar contains for a first-time caller, but overall an agent has enough to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the two parameters are fully documented in the schema (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 format, series example policy-rate, omission semantics, free-on-mismatch behavior). The description reinforces the same facts but adds little syntax or format detail the schema lacks, so this lands at the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States the concrete resource/endpoint (GET /v1/calendar) and scope (this brand's continent, optional country/series), and it names the sibling that owns past data (get_changes), so it is distinguishable from adjacent tools. It stops short of plainly saying 'returns upcoming compliance/effective-date events with reverify windows', leaving the actual subject matter to be inferred from field names like reverify_by and next_effective_known.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear operating context: FREE and unmetered, omit country for all series on the continent, valid-but-unmatched country stays free, and past changes belong on get_changes. This routes the agent to the right tool for historical vs current data. It lacks an explicit 'use this when you need X' framing and does not contrast with the many compute_* siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All euroref — European government reference data tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?