Paired Plus by Cotlet

Create group booking in Paired Plus

paired_plus_create_group_booking

Read-onlyIdempotent

Create group booking in the user's own Paired Plus account from ChatGPT, Claude or any AI agent. Returns how to do it in Paired Plus step by step (screens, buttons, fields) and opens nothing by itself; then do it with the cotlet_browser_* tools in the user's Paired Plus Cloud Browser. Paired Plus's official API: The ProSolutions Paired host publishes API help, but no self-serve API key or onboarding guide was found.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "paired_plus_create_group_booking"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedNov 11, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, and the description resolves the apparent tension in the name by stating it "opens nothing by itself." It adds useful context that the return value is a procedural walkthrough and that no self-serve API key exists, motivating the browser-tool handoff.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and the no-side-effect caveat are front-loaded and easy to find, but "from ChatGPT, Claude or any AI agent" is vendor boilerplate and the API research note is phrased as an observation rather than actionable guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema guidance tool, the description covers what comes back (steps with screens, buttons, fields) and what the agent should do next. It could still say whether the user must be signed in or what the walkthrough assumes, but nothing essential for invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics for the description to explain; the baseline of 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb+resource ("Create group booking") and immediately clarifies the actual mechanism: it returns step-by-step screens/buttons/fields rather than performing the action. It does not distinguish itself from the many other paired_plus_create_* siblings (e.g., create_appointment), so sibling differentiation is missing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear sequencing guidance: this tool produces instructions, then the agent must execute them with the cotlet_browser_* tools in the Cloud Browser. It does not state when a different booking-creation sibling would be preferred, but the follow-up path is explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Paired Plus by Cotlet tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?