Skip to main content
Glama

Milanote MCP Server and API by Cotlet

Add to-do list

add_todo_list
Destructive

To-do list card with tasks, each with an optional due date and time, added to Unsorted. Creates one to-do list on top of the board's Unsorted panel with all its tasks, unchecked, and returns each task_id. A due date without a time is due at 5 PM; Milanote reminds you at 9 AM the day it's due, by the channels in your notification settings. Times are in the Cloud Browser's time zone. Nobody else is notified; move the list to the trash in Milanote to undo it.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "board_id": "<board_id>",
      "tasks": "<tasks>"
    },
    "name": "add_todo_list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tasksYes1 to 50 tasks, in order.
titleNoList title. Default: no title.
board_idYesBoard ID from list_boards, or the board URL.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations, it discloses important behavior: tasks are created unchecked, task_id values are returned, due dates default to 5 PM when no time is given, reminders fire at 9 AM by notification settings, times use the Cloud Browser timezone, and no one else is notified. It also explains the undo path, which is valuable for a destructive, non-idempotent operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action and placement, then adds only relevant behavioral details about due dates, reminders, timezone, notifications, and undo. It is appropriately sized for a mutation tool with several important side effects.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description supplies the key return information by stating that each task_id is returned. It also covers placement, due-date semantics, reminders, timezone, notification behavior, and undo, leaving no major operational gap for calling the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaningful semantics beyond the schema by explaining due-date defaulting and reminder behavior. It does not add much beyond the schema for title or board_id, but the due-date details are useful.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it creates a to-do list card with tasks and places it on the board's Unsorted panel. It also distinguishes the result from generic card creation by specifying unchecked tasks and returned task_id values.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clarifies placement in Unsorted and explains undo via trash, but it does not explicitly compare this tool with sibling alternatives such as add_note or add_column. Usage is implied rather than framed as when-to-use versus when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.