Skip to main content
Glama

Invoice2go MCP Server and API by Cotlet

Open the browser

cotlet_browser_open
Read-only

Starts the user's Cloud Browser (a real Chrome on Cotlet, where the user is signed in to their sites) and opens url. Call it first. The URL goes to the site's open tab, else to a new tab, so the user's own tabs stay. Answers the page after it: the elements and text in view, with the same numbers. In Invoice2go it serves these actions: Create invoice, Send invoice, Send payment reminder, Create estimate, List unpaid invoices.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "cotlet_browser_open"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
appNoLeave it out: the step runs in the user's web browser. Only when cotlet_app_guide names an app's own Cloud Browser, that app's slug, e.g. milanote.
urlNoA public http or https address, e.g. https://example.com.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations: it explains that the URL targets the site's existing tab before opening a new one so the user's own tabs are preserved (explaining the non-idempotent hint), that the user is already signed in to their sites, and that the response returns the visible elements and text with stable numbering. That is real behavioral context an agent cannot get from `readOnlyHint`/`openWorldHint` alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the action and the ordering instruction, then tab behavior, then return shape. The trailing Invoice2go action list is useful for routing but reads like catalog metadata rather than a property of this tool, and it adds bulk at the end.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description correctly spends words on what comes back after the page opens (elements and text in view, same numbering), and it covers both parameters and sequencing. Nothing material is missing for an agent to call this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented. The description's app-parameter guidance largely restates the schema text, and its only new detail is the tab-targeting behavior of `url`, which is useful but modest. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema carries the parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: starts the user's Cloud Browser and opens `url`, and clarifies it is a real Chrome where the user is signed in. The "Call it first" line marks it as the entry point in the browser sequence. It does not, however, differentiate itself from the sibling `cotlet_browser_navigate`, which an agent could easily confuse it with.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Call it first" gives explicit ordering guidance relative to the other browser tools, and the app-parameter note says to omit it except when `cotlet_app_guide` names an app-specific Cloud Browser. It stops short of stating when to use `cotlet_browser_navigate` instead, which is the one obvious adjacent choice left unaddressed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.