Gymdesk by Cotlet

View gym dashboard in Gymdesk

gymdesk_view_gym_dashboard

Read-onlyIdempotent

View gym dashboard in the user's own Gymdesk account from ChatGPT, Claude or any AI agent. Returns how to do it in Gymdesk step by step (screens, buttons, fields) and opens nothing by itself; then do it with the cotlet_browser_* tools in the user's Gymdesk Cloud Browser. Gymdesk's official API: No publicly documented Gymdesk API was found on 11 Nov 2026: gymdesk.com/api, gymdesk.com/developers and docs.gymdesk.com/api returned 404 and the help center has no Gymdesk API article.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "gymdesk_view_gym_dashboard"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedNov 12, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive annotations, the description adds two real behavioral facts: the tool only returns step-by-step instructions (screens, buttons, fields) and performs no action, and downstream execution must go through cotlet_browser_* in the Cloud Browser. The note about the absence of a public Gymdesk API also explains why browser-driven guidance is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first two sentences are well front-loaded and earn their place. The closing sentence about 404s at gymdesk.com/api, gymdesk.com/developers and docs.gymdesk.com/api on "11 Nov 2026" is verbose research trivia that does not help selection or invocation, and the future-dated timestamp is confusing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no parameters, no output schema, and rich annotations, the description supplies what is missing: what it returns (step-by-step UI instructions), that it is non-executing, and which tools to chain into. An agent can act correctly from this, though the return shape is not described in detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4; there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. The description correctly implies no input is required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb+resource ("View gym dashboard") scoped to the user's own Gymdesk account, which lets an agent distinguish it from sibling reporting tools such as the marketing dashboard or member growth reports. It does not explicitly name a sibling to route against, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly frames the tool as a guidance generator rather than an executor: "Returns how to do it ... and opens nothing by itself; then do it with the cotlet_browser_* tools." That tells the agent both when to call it and what to do afterward. It offers no explicit exclusion criteria versus the many other Gymdesk view tools, so it is not a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Gymdesk by Cotlet tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?