DaySmart MCP Server and API by Cotlet

Update pet record in DaySmart

daysmart_update_pet_record

Read-onlyIdempotent

Update pet record in the user's own DaySmart account from ChatGPT, Claude or any AI agent. Returns how to do it in DaySmart step by step (screens, buttons, fields) and opens nothing by itself; then do it with the cotlet_browser_* tools in the user's DaySmart Cloud Browser. DaySmart's official API: DaySmart Salon and DaySmart Pet have no public API (checked 11 Oct 2026).

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "daysmart_update_pet_record"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

AddedNov 9, 2026

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, and the description reinforces this with 'opens nothing by itself,' explicitly resetting the expectation set by the name 'update'. It adds real context beyond the annotations: the return content (screens, buttons, fields) and the fact that mutation must happen through separate browser tools. It does not say how the instruction set is scoped to a particular pet.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The key clarification ('opens nothing by itself') is front-loaded and useful, but the opening clause about 'ChatGPT, Claude or any AI agent' is filler, and the closing line reads awkwardly ('official API: ... have no public API') while carrying a dated validity claim.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only, zero-parameter tool with no output schema, it covers what is returned and what to do next. However, it never addresses the obvious gap that a 0-parameter tool cannot identify which pet record is meant, leaving unclear whether the instructions are generic or session-scoped.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters and 100% schema coverage, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. The baseline of 4 applies, and no parameter misuse is possible.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the resource (pet record in DaySmart) and reveals the actual deliverable: step-by-step instructions with screens, buttons and fields. It also differentiates from the cotlet_browser_* siblings by stating that this tool produces guidance while those perform the actions, though it does not distinguish itself from other daysmart_* guide tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit two-step workflow: call this to get the walkthrough, then execute it with cotlet_browser_* in the user's DaySmart Cloud Browser. It also justifies why the browser route is required (no public DaySmart Salon/Pet API), but it never states a when-not condition or names an alternative guide tool for other DaySmart tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All DaySmart MCP Server and API by Cotlet tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?