Skip to main content
Glama

Bizneo MCP Server and API by Cotlet

Open the browser

cotlet_browser_open
Read-only

Starts the user's Cloud Browser (a real Chrome on Cotlet, where the user is signed in to their sites) and opens url. Call it first. The URL goes to the site's open tab, else to a new tab, so the user's own tabs stay. Answers the page after it: the elements and text in view, with the same numbers. In Bizneo it serves these actions: List absence requests, Get absence balance, Request absence, Approve absence request, Reject absence request, Request remote work, Approve remote work request, Get my timetable.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "cotlet_browser_open"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
appNoLeave it out: the step runs in the user's web browser. Only when cotlet_app_guide names an app's own Cloud Browser, that app's slug, e.g. milanote.
urlNoA public http or https address, e.g. https://example.com.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already flag readOnlyHint, openWorldHint and non-idempotency, but the description adds genuine context beyond them: it is a real Chrome where the user is already signed in, existing tabs are preserved, and it 'Answers the page after it: the elements and text in view, with the same numbers'. That return-shape disclosure matters because no output schema exists. It stops short of saying what happens on repeat calls or on failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the action and the ordering instruction, then tab behavior, then return shape. The trailing Bizneo action list is long but earns its place as routing context; otherwise the prose is tight.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description correctly covers the return (visible elements and text) and covers session state, tab reuse, and the app-scoped variant handled in the schema. Minor gaps remain on repeat-invocation behavior and any auth/prerequisite failure mode.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already explains both `url` and the conditional `app` slug. The description repeats the url intent ('opens `url`', tab routing) but adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb and resource: 'Starts the user's Cloud Browser ... and opens `url`', with the contract 'Call it first' establishing it as the session-initialization step. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling cotlet_browser_navigate, which is the one obvious ambiguity an agent could hit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Call it first' gives explicit ordering guidance, and the tab-targeting rule ('goes to the site's open tab, else to a new tab, so the user's own tabs stay') tells the agent what state it can assume afterward. No exclusion is stated, e.g. when to prefer cotlet_browser_navigate on an already-open session.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources