Skip to main content
Glama

arcgate

by dev.arcgate
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

webhookEnable

Re-enables a webhook channel that was disabled after repeated failed deliveries.

  • Cost: Free. Signed by the box's agent over method POST, path /agent/v1/<address lowercased>/webhook/<id>/enable and no body (the hash of no bytes). Or send an ARCGATE-KEY of the account the box is linked to, with no signature. Another account's key, or any key for a box that is not linked, does not apply to the box: the call is checked as if no key were sent, so it needs the signature. A key nobody holds is a 401 key_invalid. The key keeps working after the account has lapsed (its grace has ended).

  • Inputs: address and id (path). No body.

  • Returns: the id and enabled: true. The failure count is cleared. The url answers its ownership challenge again, then the messages queued while the channel was disabled are delivered in order. Enabling a channel that is enabled changes nothing.

  • Errors:

    • 404 webhook_not_found: the box has no webhook channel with that id.

  • Next:

    • webhookList: check that it is verified and delivering.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesThe webhook channel's id: 22 base64url characters, as the create or the list returned it.
addressYesThe box's address: the agent's own address (an EOA or an EIP-7702 account), any letter case. The box is keyed by it, and a signed request must be signed by it.
agentSignatureNoThe agent's EIP-712 signature over this request, as the AGENT-SIGNATURE, AGENT-NONCE and AGENT-EXPIRY headers carry it over HTTP. Sign the typed data `AgentRequest` with fields `address` (the box), `method`, `path`, `bodyHash`, `nonce` and `expiry`, under the domain {name: "arcgate", version: "1"} with no chainId (a wallet that can only sign with one, such as Circle's, may add the chainId of the chain this deployment serves, 5042 on Arc mainnet, and no other). The `path` is the request path with every parameter filled in and the address lowercased. The `bodyHash` is the keccak256 of the canonical JSON of the body you send (sorted keys, no whitespace), or of no bytes when there is none. Omitting it is a 401 signature_required unless an ARCGATE-KEY of the account the box is linked to is sent (over MCP, on the connection), and it is never a charge: the call is free.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / agentSignature / description
      Previous value: -"The agent's EIP-712 signature over this request, as the AGENT-SIGNATURE, AGENT-NONCE and AGENT-EXPIRY headers carry it over HTTP. Sign the typed data `AgentRequest` with fields `address` (the box), `method`, `path`, `bodyHash`, `nonce` and `expiry`, under the domain {name: \"arcgate\", version: \"1\"} with no chainId (a wallet that can only sign with one, such as Circle's, may add the chainId of the chain this deployment serves, 5042 on Arc mainnet, and no other). The `path` is the request path with every parameter filled in and the address lowercased. The `bodyHash` is the keccak256 of the canonical JSON of the body you send (sorted keys, no whitespace), or of no bytes when there is none. Omitting it is a 401 signature_required, never a charge: the call is free."New value: +"The agent's EIP-712 signature over this request, as the AGENT-SIGNATURE, AGENT-NONCE and AGENT-EXPIRY headers carry it over HTTP. Sign the typed data `AgentRequest` with fields `address` (the box), `method`, `path`, `bodyHash`, `nonce` and `expiry`, under the domain {name: \"arcgate\", version: \"1\"} with no chainId (a wallet that can only sign with one, such as Circle's, may add the chainId of the chain this deployment serves, 5042 on Arc mainnet, and no other). The `path` is the request path with every parameter filled in and the address lowercased. The `bodyHash` is the keccak256 of the canonical JSON of the body you send (sorted keys, no whitespace), or of no bytes when there is none. Omitting it is a 401 signature_required unless an ARCGATE-KEY of the account the box is linked to is sent (over MCP, on the connection), and it is never a charge: the call is free."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / agentSignature / description
      Previous value: -"The agent's EIP-712 signature over this request, as the AGENT-SIGNATURE, AGENT-NONCE and AGENT-EXPIRY headers carry it over HTTP. Sign the typed data `AgentRequest` with fields `address` (the box), `method`, `path`, `bodyHash`, `nonce` and `expiry`, under the domain {name: \"arcgate\", version: \"1\"} with no chainId. The `path` is the request path with every parameter filled in and the address lowercased. The `bodyHash` is the keccak256 of the canonical JSON of the body you send (sorted keys, no whitespace), or of no bytes when there is none. Omitting it is a 401 signature_required, never a charge: the call is free."New value: +"The agent's EIP-712 signature over this request, as the AGENT-SIGNATURE, AGENT-NONCE and AGENT-EXPIRY headers carry it over HTTP. Sign the typed data `AgentRequest` with fields `address` (the box), `method`, `path`, `bodyHash`, `nonce` and `expiry`, under the domain {name: \"arcgate\", version: \"1\"} with no chainId (a wallet that can only sign with one, such as Circle's, may add the chainId of the chain this deployment serves, 5042 on Arc mainnet, and no other). The `path` is the request path with every parameter filled in and the address lowercased. The `bodyHash` is the keccak256 of the canonical JSON of the body you send (sorted keys, no whitespace), or of no bytes when there is none. Omitting it is a 401 signature_required, never a charge: the call is free."
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must carry the full burden - and it does: auth paths (EIP-712 agent signature over a stated method/path/no-body hash, or an ARCGATE-KEY of the linked account), cost ('Free', never a charge), state effects (failure count cleared, url re-answers its ownership challenge, queued messages delivered in order), idempotence, and a concrete error (404 webhook_not_found).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, then organized under bold Cost/Inputs/Returns/Errors/Next labels. The density is high and every clause carries operational content (auth mechanics, idempotence, error code, follow-up); nothing is filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, no annotations, and a nested signing object, the description compensates fully: it states the return payload ('the id and enabled: true'), the single failure mode with its code, the auth requirements, and the natural next call. An agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters; the description still adds value by naming the two path inputs, asserting 'No body', specifying the path uses the lowercased address, and explaining the signature-vs-ARCGATE-KEY choice that governs the optional agentSignature object. The 'Inputs' line slightly under-lists the signature parameter, keeping it from a 5.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Re-enables a webhook channel') and adds the operative condition ('that was disabled after repeated failed deliveries'), which cleanly separates it from webhookCreate, webhookDelete, webhookRotate and webhookList. An agent can select it from the name plus first line alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains the triggering scenario (a channel disabled by repeated failed deliveries) and notes the no-op case ('Enabling a channel that is enabled changes nothing'), plus a follow-up route via webhookList. It does not explicitly contrast against webhookCreate/rotate as alternatives, so it falls short of the full when/when-not/alternative bar.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All arcgate toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources