Skip to main content
Glama

wovitamine.de Preisvergleich

Kaufberatung & Vergleiche auf wovitamine.de / buying guides

find_pages
Read-onlyIdempotent

Findet die passenden Seiten auf wovitamine.de zu einer Frage rund um Vitamine: Vergleichsseiten (z.B. nach Ausstattung oder Preisklasse), Ratgeber/Kaufberatung und Markenseiten – jeweils mit Titel, Kurzbeschreibung und Link. Ideal fuer "welcher Vitaminpräparat ist gut fuer …", "worauf achten beim Kauf" oder "Modelle von ". EN: Finds matching pages on wovitamine.de – comparisons, buying guides and brand pages with title, summary and link. Use for "which Vitaminpräparat should I buy", "what to look for" or brand questions.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "find_pages"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoThema oder Frage / topic or question (optional).
languageNoSprache der Seiten-Links / language of page links (ISO 639-1, z. B. de, en, tr, ar, fr, zh). Default: Accept-Language, sonst de. Bietet die Seite die Sprache nicht an: en.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / language / description
      Previous value: -"Antwortsprache / response language (de|en). Default: Accept-Language, sonst de."New value: +"Sprache der Seiten-Links / language of page links (ISO 639-1, z. B. de, en, tr, ar, fr, zh). Default: Accept-Language, sonst de. Bietet die Seite die Sprache nicht an: en."
    • changedInput schema / properties / language / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "de",
      -  "en"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "de",
      +  "en",
      +  "tr",
      +  "ar",
      +  "ru",
      +  "pl",
      +  "uk",
      +  "fr",
      +  "es",
      +  "it",
      +  "pt",
      +  "nl",
      +  "ro",
      +  "el",
      +  "hr",
      +  "cs",
      +  "hu",
      +  "fa",
      +  "zh",
      +  "ja"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare a safe, idempotent, closed-world read; the description adds value by disclosing the corpus (only pages on wovitamine.de) and the return shape (title, summary, link). It does not say how many results are returned or how results are ranked, but nothing contradicts the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core purpose and page types before the examples. The German and English halves are near-verbatim duplicates, which doubles the length, though that redundancy is defensible for a bilingual tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter read tool with full annotation coverage and no output schema, the description covers corpus, page types and returned fields adequately. The one real gap is that 'query' is optional and the description never says what happens when it is omitted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already explains both the query field and the language field, including the ISO 639-1 default/fallback logic. The description only adds example query formulations, so it sits at the baseline for a fully documented schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

A specific verb plus resource: it finds pages on wovitamine.de and enumerates the page types (comparisons, buying guides/Ratgeber, brand pages). This implicitly separates it from lookup_product and search_offers by content type, but the siblings are never named, so the differentiation is left to inference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Concrete trigger phrasings are given ('welcher Vitaminpräparat ist gut für …', 'worauf achten beim Kauf', 'Modelle von <Marke>'), which makes it easy to route a natural-language question to this tool. It stops short of stating when NOT to use it or pointing at lookup_product/search_offers for exact product or price lookups.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources