Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

wosolar.de Preisvergleich

by de.wosolar
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Kaufberatung & Vergleiche auf wosolar.de / buying guides

find_pages
Read-onlyIdempotent

Findet die passenden Seiten auf wosolar.de zu einer Frage rund um Solaranlagen: Vergleichsseiten (z.B. nach Ausstattung oder Preisklasse), Ratgeber/Kaufberatung und Markenseiten – jeweils mit Titel, Kurzbeschreibung und Link. Ideal fuer "welcher Solaranlage ist gut fuer …", "worauf achten beim Kauf" oder "Modelle von ". EN: Finds matching pages on wosolar.de – comparisons, buying guides and brand pages with title, summary and link. Use for "which Solaranlage should I buy", "what to look for" or brand questions.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "find_pages"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoThema oder Frage / topic or question (optional).
languageNoSprache der Seiten-Links / language of page links (ISO 639-1, z. B. de, en, tr, ar, fr, zh). Default: Accept-Language, sonst de. Bietet die Seite die Sprache nicht an: en.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / language / description
      Previous value: -"Antwortsprache / response language (de|en). Default: Accept-Language, sonst de."New value: +"Sprache der Seiten-Links / language of page links (ISO 639-1, z. B. de, en, tr, ar, fr, zh). Default: Accept-Language, sonst de. Bietet die Seite die Sprache nicht an: en."
    • changedInput schema / properties / language / enum
      Previous value: -[
-  "de",
-  "en"
-]New value: +[
+  "de",
+  "en",
+  "tr",
+  "ar",
+  "ru",
+  "pl",
+  "uk",
+  "fr",
+  "es",
+  "it",
+  "pt",
+  "nl",
+  "ro",
+  "el",
+  "hr",
+  "cs",
+  "hu",
+  "fa",
+  "zh",
+  "ja"
+]
  2. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already establish that this is a read-only, idempotent, non-destructive lookup. The description adds useful behavioral context beyond that by saying results include title, summary, and link and by characterizing the page types searched.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core function and examples, and then repeats the same information in English. The bilingual duplication adds length, but it is still reasonably concise and easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only page search tool, the definition covers the content sources, example use cases, and return fields. Because there is no output schema, the description helpfully states that results include title, summary, and link, though it could say more about result limits or ranking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and both the optional query and the language enum are well documented in the schema. The description does not add parameter-level meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: it finds matching wosolar.de pages about solar questions, including comparison, guide/buying advice, and brand pages. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools such as lookup_product and search_offers, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear example query situations such as 'which solar system should I buy', 'what to look for when buying', and brand questions, which helps an agent choose this tool. It does not state when not to use it or name sibling alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All wosolar.de Preisvergleich toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources