Skip to main content
Glama

wokonsole.de Preisvergleich

Produkt auf wokonsole.de per ID/URL nachschlagen

lookup_product
Read-onlyIdempotent

Schlaegt ein konkretes Produkt im aktuellen wokonsole.de-Katalog per Produkt-ID (Amazon-ASIN bzw. externalId aus search_offers) ODER per Amazon-Produkt-URL nach. Liefert Bestpreis, 30-Tage-Preisstatistik und den Angebots-Link. Genau eines der Felder id/url angeben. Looks up a specific product in the wokonsole.de catalog by ID (ASIN/externalId) or Amazon product URL (read-only).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNoProdukt-ID: Amazon-ASIN oder externalId.
urlNoAmazon-Produkt-URL (z.B. https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0ABC123DE) — die ASIN wird extrahiert.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
siteNo
countYes
queryNo
facetsNoVerfuegbare Filter-Werte (Marke + domain-spezifische Attribute) mit Trefferzahlen — zum gezielten Nachfiltern via query/brand/minPrice/maxPrice.
productsYes
updatedAtNo
disclosureNo
catalogVersionNo

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint. Description adds specific output details (Bestpreis, 30-Tage-Preisstatistik, Angebots-Link), which is helpful context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences in both German and English. Clear and front-loaded, though slightly repetitive due to bilingual redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given full schema coverage, output schema, and thoughtful annotations, the description covers all necessary aspects: inputs, output types, usage rule, and read-only nature.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage with parameter descriptions. Description adds critical usage constraint that exactly one parameter must be provided, which is not encoded in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool looks up a specific product in the wokonsole.de catalog by ID or URL, and lists outputs. Distinguishes from sibling 'search_offers' by specifying lookup vs search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states 'Genau eines der Felder id/url angeben' (exactly one of id/url) and marks the operation as read-only, providing clear when-to-use and constraint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

lookup_product and search_offers have clearly distinct purposes: one is for retrieving detailed info on a specific product by ID/URL, the other is for searching across catalog with filters. No overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: lookup_product and search_offers. No mixing of styles.

Tool Count3/5

With only 2 tools, the server is minimal. For a price comparison service, one might expect additional tools for comparing products or setting price alerts, but search and lookup are the core functions. The count is borderline acceptable.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the primary use cases of searching and looking up product details and price trends. Missing features like product comparison or price alerts are minor gaps for a focused price comparison tool.

Resources