belegte_zeitraeumeBereits belegte Zeitspannen der kommenden Monate – ohne jeden Personenbezug. Nützlich, um freie Termine vorzuschlagen.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| monate | No | Vorausschau in Monaten (Vorgabe 12). |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare read-only and idempotent behavior. The description adds valuable context by emphasizing that there is no personal reference ('ohne jeden Personenbezug'), which is a privacy guarantee not present in annotations, and clarifies that the output is occupied periods rather than availability.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description consists of two short, front-loaded sentences. The first sentence immediately conveys the core purpose, and the second adds a use case without any wasted words or redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read-only tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description covers the essential aspects: the resource (occupied time periods), the time horizon (coming months), and the intended use (suggesting free appointments). It does not specify output format, but this is a minor gap given the tool's simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema fully documents the single parameter 'monate' with range and default, covering 100% of the parameter info. The description does not add additional parameter semantics, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states that the tool returns already occupied time periods for the coming months, which is a specific resource. It distinguishes itself from a generic availability query by the term 'belegte Zeitspannen', though it does not explicitly name sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides an explicit use case: suggesting free appointments ('Nützlich, um freie Termine vorzuschlagen'). It does not include exclusion criteria or alternatives, but the context is sufficiently clear for an agent to select it when free slots need to be derived.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but 'angebote', 'preise', and 'preis_berechnen' all relate to pricing and could be confused. Similarly, 'verfuegbarkeit_pruefen' and 'belegte_zeitraeume' both deal with availability, though the descriptions clarify the difference.
Naming conventions are inconsistent. Some tools use pure nouns ('angebote', 'preise', 'bewertungen'), while others use compound nouns ('anfrage_link', 'belegte_zeitraeume') or verb-object phrases ('faq_suchen', 'preis_berechnen', 'verfuegbarkeit_pruefen'). This mix makes the tool names less predictable.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a holiday rental domain. Each tool addresses a distinct need (info, availability, pricing, contact, reviews, FAQ) without unnecessary redundancy.
The tool set covers the full range of typical user inquiries: accommodation details, availability checks, price calculations, special offers, contact options, reviews, and FAQ. No critical gaps are apparent.