Skip to main content
Glama

LinkedIn MCP Server (Salesbot)

by cz.salesbot

get_job_posting_details

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get full details of a LinkedIn job posting, including the hiring team — the recruiter or hiring manager who posted it. Use this after search_job_postings to find the exact person to reach out to at a company that is hiring. Also returns applicant and view counts, which indicate how urgently the role needs filling. Uses the connected LinkedIn account (Classic, no Recruiter needed).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
job_idYesLinkedIn job posting ID, as returned in the job_id field by search_job_postings.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint false. Description adds that it returns applicant/view counts and uses connected LinkedIn account (Classic, no Recruiter). This provides additional context on data and access requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences with no wasted words. Front-loaded: first sentence states purpose, second gives usage context, third adds behavioral details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description must hint at return values. It mentions 'full details including hiring team, applicant and view counts'. While not exhaustive, it gives sufficient context for tool selection and understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% coverage with description linking job_id to search_job_postings. Description reinforces this by mentioning 'after search_job_postings', but doesn't add new parameter semantics beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it gets full details of a LinkedIn job posting, including hiring team. It differentiates from sibling search_job_postings by specifying it returns detailed information for a single posting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use this after search_job_postings to find the exact person to reach out to', providing clear when-to-use guidance and sequencing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All LinkedIn MCP Server (Salesbot) toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap among search tools (search_job_postings, search_google_xray, search_linkedin_people, search_web) and messaging tools (send_connection_request, send_linkedin_message, reply_to_chat). However, detailed descriptions clarify the differences.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., add_contacts_to_campaign, list_campaigns). No mixing of conventions.

Tool Count3/5

48 tools is high but justifiable given the broad domain (LinkedIn outreach, CRM, campaigns, job postings, etc.). However, some tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple search tools).

Completeness5/5

The tool set covers the entire workflow: searching, connecting, messaging, campaign management, CRM operations (fields, stages, tasks, notes), job postings, and posting. No obvious gaps.

Resources