Skip to main content
Glama

search_zeltser

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search Lenny Zeltser's Website by keywords. Security articles on malware analysis, incident response, and security leadership. Searches across titles, abstracts, full content, and topics.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum number of results to return (default: 10, max: 25)
queryYesSearch terms to find relevant content

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
siteYes
countYes
queryYes
resultsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "count": {
      +      "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +      "minimum": 0,
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "query": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "results": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": false,
      +        "properties": {
      +          "abstract": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "date": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "title": {
      +            "minLength": 1,
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "topics": {
      +            "items": {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            "type": "array"
      +          },
      +          "url": {
      +            "minLength": 1,
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "url",
      +          "title"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "site": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "domain": {
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "minLength": 1,
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "name",
      +        "domain"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "query",
      +    "site",
      +    "count",
      +    "results"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, covering safety. The description adds search scope (titles, abstracts, full content, topics) but does not disclose pagination behavior, rate limits, or other operational details, offering only modest additional context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three concise, front-loaded sentences with no wasted words. Each sentence contributes relevant information about the tool's purpose and scope.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple search tool with 2 parameters, good annotations, and an output schema, the description is sufficiently complete. It does not need to explain return values since the output schema exists, and it clearly conveys the tool's function and scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides 100% coverage for both parameters (query and limit) with clear descriptions. The description adds no additional semantic meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches Lenny Zeltser's website by keywords, listing content types and search scope. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_article, which likely retrieves a specific article.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use the tool (searching across titles, abstracts, full content, and topics) but does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions. The verb 'search' implies the use case relative to siblings like get_article, but it is not explicitly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources