Skip to main content
Glama

Get Sheet Music

get_sheet_music
Read-only

Use this when an agent needs to check for an explicitly published sheet-music resource. Never infers rights or availability. Do not infer ownership, licensing, or unpublished availability.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / additionalProperties / $ref
      Added value: +"#/definitions/__schema0"
    • removedOutput schema / additionalProperties / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "boolean"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "items": {
      -      "$ref": "#/additionalProperties"
      -    },
      -    "type": "array"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": {
      -      "$ref": "#/additionalProperties"
      -    },
      -    "type": "object"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / definitions
      Added value: +{
      +  "__schema0": {
      +    "anyOf": [
      +      {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      {
      +        "type": "number"
      +      },
      +      {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      },
      +      {
      +        "type": "null"
      +      },
      +      {
      +        "items": {
      +          "$ref": "#/definitions/__schema0"
      +        },
      +        "type": "array"
      +      },
      +      {
      +        "additionalProperties": {
      +          "$ref": "#/definitions/__schema0"
      +        },
      +        "propertyNames": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      }
      +    ]
      +  }
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Given annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, the description adds valuable behavioral context: the tool only recognizes explicitly published resources and must not be used to infer rights, ownership, licensing, or unpublished availability. This goes beyond the annotations and prevents misuse.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. The first sentence states the use case; the second sentence provides necessary negative constraints. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (one parameter) and has an output schema, so the description doesn't need to explain return values. It covers the key behavioral constraint. Minor gap: it doesn't clarify what happens if no matching resource exists, but that is not essential for selecting/invoking the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter 'id' with 0% description coverage, and the description adds no explanation about what 'id' refers to or how to format it. Although the parameter name is self-explanatory, the description provides no semantic value beyond the schema itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action (check for) and resource type (explicitly published sheet-music resource), with explicit constraints. It clearly differentiates from sibling tools like get_track or get_composition by focusing on sheet music and explicit publication.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says when to use ('when an agent needs to check for an explicitly published sheet-music resource') and provides strong 'when-not' guidance ('Never infers rights or availability. Do not infer ownership, licensing, or unpublished availability.'). It does not name specific alternative tools, but the usage boundary is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources