Skip to main content
Glama

Wisely x402 Agent-Payment Infrastructure

x402_payment_session_status

Check a wallet handoff session. After the user signs, returns the signed X-PAYMENT header and paid-retry instructions for the agent.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNo
typeNo
assetNo
inputNoPublic-safe request body/input for a hosted service or endpoint. Never include secrets, raw cards, wallet keys, passwords, or private account tokens.
itemsNo
queryNo
sinceNo
itemIdNo
acceptsNo
contentNoPublic-safe creator content for preview/import. Do not include secrets, private student data, or copyrighted material you do not own.
networkNo
audienceNoOptional audience hint for wisely_start_here / wisely_get_playbook / wisely_agent_instructions.
payoutIdNo
platformNoOptional OS/platform hint for local bridge setup, e.g. windows, mac, linux.
amountUsdNo
creatorIdNo
fromAssetNo
localPortNoOptional localhost port for the local commerce bridge MCP server. Defaults to 4027.
receiptIdNo
sellerUrlNoThird-party x402 paid resource URL to probe for HTTP 402 payment requirements.
serviceIdNo
sessionIdNoWallet handoff/payment session id returned by x402_wallet_handoff/connect_wallet.
toAddressNo
sellerBodyNoPublic-safe POST body for an external x402 seller. Never include cookies, bearer tokens, wallet secrets, private keys, card data, or account passwords.
contentTypeNo
fromAddressNo
fromNetworkNo
manifestUrlNo
paidActionsNo
endpointSlugNo
sellerMethodNoUse POST for paid APIs that need a public-safe body before returning 402.
payoutAddressNo
serverJsonUrlNo
idempotencyKeyNoStable retry key for paid invokes and wallet handoff sessions.
paymentPayloadNo
includeExamplesNoSet false to request a shorter playbook response.
fromTokenAddressNo
preferredNetworkNoPreferred payment network for wallet handoff, e.g. eip155:8453 or base.
defaultEntitlementNo
paymentRequirementNo
paymentRequirementsNo
returnSignedPaymentNoAlias for includeSignedPayment.
includeSignedPaymentNoFor x402_payment_session_status, include the signed X-PAYMENT payload when the user has signed.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / localPort
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional localhost port for the local commerce bridge MCP server. Defaults to 4027.",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / platform
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional OS/platform hint for local bridge setup, e.g. windows, mac, linux.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description gives some behavioral information: it returns the signed header after the user signs, implying a read-only status check. However, it does not disclose error behavior, prerequisites' handling, or side effects, leaving gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two brief sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and contains no unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's 43 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too minimal to fully guide an agent on how to invoke the tool correctly. It doesn't specify which params to set (e.g., sessionId, includeSignedPayment) or explain the retry instructions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 33% coverage and 43 parameters, but the description does not explain which parameters are relevant or how to use them. It only implies that the signed X-PAYMENT header is returned, which relates to includeSignedPayment but is not explicit. This fails to compensate for low schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks a wallet handoff session and specifies the return value (signed X-PAYMENT header and paid-retry instructions), distinguishing it from other x402 status tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear timing condition ('After the user signs') which indicates when to call the tool, but it does not mention alternative tools or when not to use it. That is clear context without explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.