Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

WebinarIgnition

by com.webinarignition
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Answer a WebinarIgnition question

wi_answer_product_question
Read-onlyIdempotent

Answers a question about WebinarIgnition itself: what it can do, its limits, integrations, and whether it fits the host's case. The answer comes only from the connector's checked knowledge base. Take it when a host asks about the product, for example "Does this work with my shop?" It needs the question in the host's language, German by default. Nothing is created and no site is touched. When the base holds no matching entry, the answer says so and points to https://webinarignition.com/. Words hosts use: product question, limits, integrations, does it fit

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "wi_answer_product_question"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textNoWhat the host said (thema · weiter) or the question in the host's language (frage).
languageNoThe language the host writes in.de

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
-  "text"
-]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes beyond the readOnly/idempotent annotations by disclosing the answer source (only the connector's checked knowledge base) and the no-match fallback (answers that it has no entry and points to webinarignition.com). It also reassures that nothing is created and no site is touched, which corroborates rather than contradicts the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the core purpose and follows with usage, source, safety, and fallback in a logical order. The trailing 'Words hosts use' list is mild keyword padding but functions as routing triggers, so the slight verbosity is defensible.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema, full annotations, and 100% schema coverage supplied, the description fills the remaining gaps: when to call it, where answers come from, what happens on no match, and that no site changes occur. Nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented and the description mostly restates the language default of German. It adds modest meaning by emphasizing that the text should be in the host's own language, but supplies no format or syntax guidance beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Answers a question about WebinarIgnition itself') and scopes it to product capability, limits, and integrations. This cleanly separates it from the sibling wi_answer_webinar_question, which covers webinar content rather than the product.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit triggering condition ('Take it when a host asks about the product') with a concrete example ('Does this work with my shop?'). It does not name the sibling alternative outright, but the 'WebinarIgnition itself' phrasing implies the boundary well enough for routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All WebinarIgnition toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources