Skip to main content
Glama

Get a store product

webanto_get_product
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read one synced store product by its Webanto product id.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "product_id": "<product_id>"
    },
    "name": "webanto_get_product"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
product_idYesWebanto identifier of the synced store product.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
productYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so little is left to disclose. The description adds only the notion that the product is "synced", hinting at a mirrored data source, but says nothing about behavior when a product is missing or not yet synced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler or redundancy. It is efficiently sized, though its brevity leaves no room for routing guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with full annotations and an output schema, the description covers the essentials: verb, resource, and key. The remaining gap is routing to webanto_list_products when the id is not known.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With a single parameter at 100% schema description coverage, the schema already defines product_id as the Webanto identifier. The description merely restates that in prose, adding no format, length, or sourcing guidance beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb plus resource: "Read one synced store product by its Webanto product id" tells the agent exactly what is fetched and by which key. It implicitly contrasts with webanto_list_products (one vs many) but never names the sibling, so it falls short of full differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: the phrase "by its Webanto product id" signals a single-record lookup that presupposes a known id, which nudges the agent toward webanto_list_products when the id is unknown. No explicit when-to-use, when-not, or alternative is stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources