Skip to main content
Glama

Waveleta Market Data

Get equity history

get_equity_history
Read-onlyIdempotent

US equities daily price history for one symbol (early access). Costs EUR 0.002 per call.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "symbol": "<symbol>"
    },
    "name": "get_equity_history"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
symbolYesTicker, e.g. AAPL

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds two genuinely useful traits beyond that: a EUR 0.002 per-call cost and an 'early access' stability warning. It does not disclose pagination behavior, how 'limit' interacts with the daily series, or the shape of the returned data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero filler, with the resource and scope front-loaded before the cost caveat. Every clause carries information an agent can act on.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter read tool with annotations covering safety, the definition is close to sufficient, but with no output schema the description should say what a result row contains (OHLC? close only? date field?) and how limit maps to the returned series. The cost disclosure is a plus, but the return-value gap keeps it at adequate rather than complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%: 'symbol' is documented in the schema, while 'limit' is only constrained (1-1000, default 100) without explanation. The description implies a daily series, which hints that limit means number of days, but it never states this explicitly, so it adds only marginal meaning over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('daily price history') plus the asset class ('US equities') and cardinality ('one symbol'), which lets an agent separate it from crypto/fx/commodities siblings. The '(early access)' tag adds a stability caveat but the core purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to choose this over the sibling market-data tools, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. The only usage-relevant information is the per-call cost, which informs a decision but does not tell the agent when this tool is the right one.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources