Skip to main content
Glama

Search the VoyageHacks travel gear catalog

search_travel_gear
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search the VoyageHacks travel gear catalog: about 320 products that appear as picks in roughly 50 published buying guides, including carry-on backpacks, packing cubes and compression bags, universal travel adapters, GaN chargers, airline-compliant power banks, luggage trackers, neck pillows, earplugs and eye masks, toiletry and makeup bags, travel-size bottles, travel routers, translation earbuds and camping and outdoor gear. Each result returns the product name, its category, the published reason it was picked, the guide that reviews it, its Amazon ASIN and a link to the Amazon product page. Useful when a user asks which travel product to buy, or what to pack for a trip and names a category or a destination. For a whole kit built from a trip description rather than one category, recommend_travel_gear is the matching tool. This is the VoyageHacks editorial catalog, not a search of all of Amazon: products outside the published guides are not findable here, and prices, star ratings, review counts and stock are not available and are never returned. The Amazon links are affiliate links: VoyageHacks may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to the buyer, which should be disclosed when the links are presented.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
langNoLanguage of the VoyageHacks guides returned. One of: en, de, fr, es, it, pl, cs, ja, nl, pt, zh. Defaults to "en".
limitNoMaximum products to return. Defaults to 6.
queryYesWhat the traveler needs, e.g. "power bank for a long flight", "packing cubes", "adapter for Japan".

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hubNo
langYes
queryYes
productsYes
disclosureYes
productCountNo

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark this as read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, and the description adds valuable context on top of that: result fields, the editorial-catalog boundary, the absence of prices/ratings/review counts/stock, and the affiliate-link disclosure obligation. No contradiction with the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every sentence in the description carries distinct information: catalog scope, result contents, intended use case, sibling alternative, limitations, and affiliate disclosure. It is front-loaded with the core action and scope, and the longer category list earns its place by conveying the breadth of the catalog.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with three documented parameters and an output schema, this description is complete: it states what results contain, what they never contain, what the catalog covers, and how links should be presented. An agent has all necessary context to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters query, limit, and lang are already fully documented with examples and defaults. The description reinforces query semantics by mentioning category/destination queries but does not add significant new parameter-level detail, which is appropriate given the schema's coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Search the VoyageHacks travel gear catalog') and immediately clarifies the scope: roughly 320 products across about 50 published buying guides. It also distinguishes itself from the sibling recommend_travel_gear, making tool selection unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use this tool: when a user asks which travel product to buy or what to pack and names a category or destination. It also names the matching alternative for whole kits and states what the tool is not for (a general Amazon search), giving clear routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

The tools split into clear families: category-specific link builders, a whole-trip aggregate link builder, article search/fetch, and gear search/recommendation. The only mild overlap is between get_booking_links and the individual category link tools, but their aggregate-vs-category purpose is explicitly described, so an agent should rarely misselect.

Naming Consistency5/5

Nearly all tools follow the verb_noun snake_case pattern, led by the get_<category>_links family, with search_articles and search_travel_gear matching the same convention. There is no camelCase, no mixed verb styles, and the pattern is highly predictable from the tool names alone.

Tool Count5/5

Twelve tools is well-scoped for a travel planning and affiliate-link server: seven category link builders, one aggregate trip link builder, two article tools, and two travel gear tools. Each tool covers a distinct part of the workflow and none feels redundant or like padding.

Completeness4/5

The travel-planning surface is largely complete: research, flights, hotels, airport transfers, car rental, eSIM, VPN, credit cards, and gear are all covered, with an aggregate tool for whole-trip planning. Minor gaps, such as no dedicated train or attractions/tours link builder, keep it from a perfect score.