Skip to main content
Glama

Get a status page

vs_status_pages_get
Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch one status page with its settings, groups, monitors and servers.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "vs_status_pages_get"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesStatus page id.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful behavioral context by disclosing that the fetched page includes its settings, groups, monitors, and servers, though it does not mention error behavior for missing ids.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is a single, front-loaded sentence with zero wasted words. It states the action, singular scope, and included payload in one efficient line.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read operation with a fully described id parameter and annotations covering safety, the description is mostly complete and even lists the returned sub-resources despite there being no output schema. Minor gaps around error handling or full response shape prevent a perfect score.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single id parameter is clearly documented in the schema as "Status page id." The description does not add any format or sourcing details beyond that, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ("Fetch") and resource ("one status page"), and the singular "one" distinguishes it from the sibling list tool vs_status_pages_list. It also clarifies that the response includes related settings, groups, monitors, and servers, so the agent knows exactly what this tool returns.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by saying it fetches one status page, which contrasts with listing tools, but it does not explicitly state when to use this versus vs_status_pages_list or how to obtain the required id. No exclusions or prerequisites are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.