Shipped products Virohana built and runs for real customers. Flagship: the e-Financials MCP. Call product_detail() for the full write-up.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states what is listed, not side effects, auth needs, or rate limits. As a read operation, it lacks confirmation of no side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences, but the first is informal and somewhat run-on. It could be more precise, though it is relatively concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the presence of an output schema and no annotations, the description provides the minimum: it tells what is listed. However, it lacks context about the return format or any prerequisites, which would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the schema handles everything. The description adds no param info, but with 0 parameters a baseline of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states it lists shipped products built by Virohana and mentions a flagship product, clearly indicating the tool's purpose. It distinguishes from the sibling tool product_detail by directing to call it for full details.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies using list_products for an overview and product_detail for details, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over other siblings or provide exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a distinct purpose: about_virohana provides background, list_journal and read_post handle journal content, list_products and product_detail handle products, list_services and service_detail handle services, search_site provides cross-domain search, and start_here offers a guided tour. No two tools overlap significantly.
Tool names use snake_case consistently, with a pattern of 'verb_noun' for lists (list_journal, list_products, list_services) and 'noun_detail' for details (product_detail, service_detail). However, about_virohana and start_here break the pattern slightly, and read_post and search_site are descriptive but not exactly verb-noun. Overall, naming is clear and predictable.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a company information site. It covers core functions: about, journal, products, services, search, and a guided start. No tool is redundant, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage of the Virohana site: background (about_virohana), journal listing and reading (list_journal, read_post), product listing and details (list_products, product_detail), service listing and details (list_services, service_detail), full-site search (search_site), and an entry point (start_here). There are no obvious gaps for a read-only informational website.