The Virohana journal — essays and field notes, newest first. Call read_post() to read one in full.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations. The description discloses ordering ('newest first') but does not mention pagination, return format, or any other behavioral traits. Adequate for a simple list tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, both front-loaded: first states purpose and ordering, second gives usage hint. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple with no parameters and an output schema that likely documents return values. The description covers the key points needed for an agent to decide to use it and understand its scope.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable as there is nothing to explain. Baseline 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the tool lists journal entries (essays and field notes) in newest-first order, and distinguishes itself from sibling 'read_post' by directing users to that tool for full reading.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly says to call 'read_post' to read a full post, implying this tool is for browsing only. No explicit when-not-to-use, but the alternative is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a distinct purpose: about_virohana provides background, list_journal and read_post handle journal content, list_products and product_detail handle products, list_services and service_detail handle services, search_site provides cross-domain search, and start_here offers a guided tour. No two tools overlap significantly.
Tool names use snake_case consistently, with a pattern of 'verb_noun' for lists (list_journal, list_products, list_services) and 'noun_detail' for details (product_detail, service_detail). However, about_virohana and start_here break the pattern slightly, and read_post and search_site are descriptive but not exactly verb-noun. Overall, naming is clear and predictable.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a company information site. It covers core functions: about, journal, products, services, search, and a guided start. No tool is redundant, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage of the Virohana site: background (about_virohana), journal listing and reading (list_journal, read_post), product listing and details (list_products, product_detail), service listing and details (list_services, service_detail), full-site search (search_site), and an entry point (start_here). There are no obvious gaps for a read-only informational website.