What Virohana is, where it stands, and the principles behind everything it builds.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description gives minimal behavioral insight beyond the stated purpose, leaving out traits like read-only or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single clear sentence, efficient but could be more specific about content.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and presence of output schema, description is adequate but does not mention return format or content type.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline is 4; description adds no additional parameter info but this is acceptable.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states it covers Virohana's identity, position, and principles, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools that list specific items.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage for general information about Virohana, but no explicit when-to-use or alternatives compared to siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a distinct purpose: about_virohana provides background, list_journal and read_post handle journal content, list_products and product_detail handle products, list_services and service_detail handle services, search_site provides cross-domain search, and start_here offers a guided tour. No two tools overlap significantly.
Tool names use snake_case consistently, with a pattern of 'verb_noun' for lists (list_journal, list_products, list_services) and 'noun_detail' for details (product_detail, service_detail). However, about_virohana and start_here break the pattern slightly, and read_post and search_site are descriptive but not exactly verb-noun. Overall, naming is clear and predictable.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a company information site. It covers core functions: about, journal, products, services, search, and a guided start. No tool is redundant, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The tool surface provides comprehensive coverage of the Virohana site: background (about_virohana), journal listing and reading (list_journal, read_post), product listing and details (list_products, product_detail), service listing and details (list_services, service_detail), full-site search (search_site), and an entry point (start_here). There are no obvious gaps for a read-only informational website.