Skip to main content
Glama

Viral Manager

remove_watchlist_account

Destructive

Remove an Instagram account from the watchlist. DESTRUCTIVE: this permanently deletes the account AND all its detected viral posts (and any assignments pointing at them). Only the org owner or an admin can do this. To stop tracking without losing data, remove it from the app instead after exporting what you need.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
accountYesAccount to remove: username (with or without @) or account id from list_watchlist_accounts

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Although annotations already include destructiveHint=true, the description goes well beyond them by specifying the exact cascade: it 'permanently deletes the account AND all its detected viral posts (and any assignments pointing at them)' and adds the authorization requirement. This is valuable behavioral context the annotations do not provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no filler: the first states the action, the second flags destructiveness with exact consequences, and the third gives the safe alternative. Critical information is front-loaded and every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is complete. It covers the action, permanent consequences, permission requirements, and an alternative safe path. Nothing needed to correctly select and invoke the tool is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for its single parameter, clearly documenting that 'account' accepts a username or account id from list_watchlist_accounts. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond referring to the account, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Remove an Instagram account from the watchlist.' It clearly differentiates this tool from siblings like add_watchlist_account and list_watchlist_accounts, and the destructive detail further clarifies that this is a removal with serious consequences.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states who may use it ('Only the org owner or an admin'), the condition under which it is appropriate, and a when-not scenario: 'To stop tracking without losing data, remove it from the app instead after exporting what you need.' This gives the agent clear decision guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a distinct target resource/action, and the descriptions are unusually explicit about differences (e.g., 'Distinct from the watchlist', 'Separate list from list_tags'). A few pairs are still easy to confuse without careful reading: delete_folder vs delete_folders differ only by singular/plural, and the three download-URL tools (get_post_download_url, get_asset_download_url, get_my_account_post_download_url) plus the category/tag families require attention to pick correctly.

Naming Consistency4/5

The snake_case verb_noun pattern is followed consistently throughout (list_*, get_*, create_*, update_*, delete_*, set_*, tag_*). Minor deviations: archive_folder and archive_my_accounts also perform restore despite their names, delete_folder/delete_folders split one operation by cardinality, and tag_posts/tag_my_account use a different verb style than the set_* family for metadata mutations.

Tool Count2/5

At 56 tools, this far exceeds the 25+ threshold for 'too many,' even though the server spans multiple subdomains (watchlist, analysis, assignments, folders, my accounts, assets, Drive, categories/tags). Obvious consolidation candidates exist — delete_folder/delete_folders, the three download-URL getters, and the parallel list_my_account_* listers — and the sheer surface is heavy for an agent to navigate.

Completeness4/5

Core workflows are thoroughly covered with no dead ends: watchlist → analyze → assign → folder → track → approve has full lifecycle support, including reversible archive vs permanent delete choices. Minor gaps exist but are work-aroundable: no create/update for my accounts or models (app-side OAuth/admin only), no way to delete a viral post or a post note, and asset upload only happens in the app.

Resources