read_docFetch the full Markdown of one document by its site path (for example /docs/concepts/embeddings-101), as returned by search_docs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | Site path of the document, e.g. /docs/tutorials/filter-syntax |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The readOnlyHint and idempotentHint annotations already cover side-effect behavior, and the description does not contradict them. The description adds useful context by indicating that the operation retrieves full Markdown content rather than a summary, which supports safe expectations about the response.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, focused sentence with no redundant content. It front-loads the core action and resource, and immediately follows with the required parameter and an illustrative example.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read operation, the description adequately conveys that the tool returns the full Markdown of the specified document. While error behavior for a nonexistent path is not mentioned, the core usage and expected output are clear enough for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter, 'path', is fully described with its purpose and a realistic example. Schema coverage is 100% and the description aligns exactly with the parameter's role.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Fetch', the resource type 'document', and the scope 'one document by its site path'. It also contrasts with search_docs by specifying full Markdown content, making the tool's distinct purpose unmistakable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The phrase 'as returned by search_docs' provides useful guidance that this tool is meant to be used with paths originating from search results. Including a concrete path example further clarifies the expected input format, though it does not explicitly enumerate all scenarios where this tool should be preferred over siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: search, read, API reference, quickstart, formats, benchmarks. The main overlap is between compare_storage_tiers and get_pricing, which both cover storage-tier pricing and could confuse an agent.
The set mostly follows a predictable get_/list_/read_/search_ verb pattern with snake_case throughout. Minor deviation: read_doc and search_docs use navigation verbs instead of get_/list_, but the pattern remains readable.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a documentation-focused server. Each tool covers a meaningful documentation need without redundancy or bloat.
The surface covers the full documentation workflow: searching docs, reading docs, quickstart, API operations, pricing, storage tiers, formats, and benchmarks. No obvious dead ends or missing core operations.