Skip to main content
Glama

Texting setup status

spur_get_texting_setup
Read-onlyIdempotent

The user's texting setup: phone numbers bought in Spur (and which can send), carrier (A2P 10DLC) registration status, carrier notes, what's still missing, and the next step. Call this before helping with numbers or registration.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "spur_get_texting_setup"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
refreshNotrue = ask the carriers for the latest status first (use when the user is waiting on approval)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is a read-only, idempotent, closed-world operation, lowering the disclosure burden. The description adds useful data categories like carrier notes and next-step guidance, but does not explain refresh/caching behavior or result shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences, front-loaded with the returned data and followed by the usage trigger. There is no redundant text, and every clause contributes useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity read-only status tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description sufficiently explains what information is returned and when to call it. The remaining refresh semantics are already covered by the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the single optional 'refresh' parameter is already documented in the schema. The description does not add any parameter meaning beyond that, which fits the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the exact resource and enumerates the returned information: phone numbers, send capability, A2P 10DLC status, carrier notes, missing items, and next step. This makes the status-overview purpose unambiguous and distinguishes it from sibling actions such as buying numbers or submitting registration.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The sentence 'Call this before helping with numbers or registration' gives a clear usage trigger. It does not state explicit when-not conditions or name alternative tools, so it stops short of full routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources