Skip to main content
Glama

Get Brand Context

get_brand_context
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns everything that shapes content: the Brand page's four sections (profile.voice, profile.visual, profile.overlay for entities and evidence, profile.offer for what is sold today, what is planned, pricing, promises and claims to avoid; profile.voiceError, visualError, overlayError or offerError explains a stored section that needs repair), personas (with wants, convincedBy, objections, pains, jobs and language: the customer's own words), pillars, angles, markets, buyer questions, KPI targets (for their actuals and progress, call get_content_performance), and active content exclusions. Call it before drafting or reviewing. brandReview says, per Brand section, whether a person has confirmed it (confirmed, confirmedAt) or it needs repair; tell the person which sections still need their review. claims lists the active claims (id, text, category, sourceQuote, sourceId, sourceTitle): the only facts drafts may state as certifications, prices, lead times or specs. Retired claims are left out; for them and for search, call list_claims. sources lists the Claims & sources entries (id, title, url) that overlay evidence and claims cite by sourceId. profile.visual.logoAssetId is an asset id; call get_asset for the image. organizationJsonLd is the ready-to-paste Organization JSON-LD script built from the saved primary entity, company site, sameAs and Wikidata ids (null when there are no sameAs URLs or Wikidata ids), plus logo when the Brand logo was imported from a public URL (uploaded and Drive logos have no public URL, so logo is left out); it goes in the head of the person's home page. Personas, pillars, angles and markets include inactive rows (active: false). Each angle is one persona × pillar pair: it carries personaId and pillarId plus personaName and pillarName, so group angles by those to see which pairs have one. People edit personas, pillars and angles at /settings/messaging, and markets at /settings/markets. A market with null locationCode or languageCode has no search location, so AI search volume and answer-engine checks skip it. Does not change anything. Related: update_brand_profile, save_strategy_item, save_content_exclusion, list_claims, save_claim, get_channel_rules.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
anglesYes
appUrlYes
claimsYes
marketsYes
pillarsYes
profileYes
sourcesYes
personasYes
exclusionsYes
kpiTargetsYes
brandReviewYes
buyerQuestionsYes
organizationJsonLdYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / brandReview / items / properties / section / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "voice",
      -  "visual",
      -  "overlay"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "voice",
      +  "visual",
      +  "overlay",
      +  "offer"
      +]
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / sourceQuote
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / sourceTitle
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / claims / items / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "id",
      -  "text",
      -  "category",
      -  "sourceId"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "id",
      +  "text",
      +  "category",
      +  "sourceQuote",
      +  "sourceId",
      +  "sourceTitle"
      +]
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / organizationJsonLd
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "angles",
      -  "appUrl",
      -  "brandReview",
      -  "buyerQuestions",
      -  "claims",
      -  "exclusions",
      -  "kpiTargets",
      -  "markets",
      -  "personas",
      -  "pillars",
      -  "profile",
      -  "sources"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "angles",
      +  "appUrl",
      +  "brandReview",
      +  "buyerQuestions",
      +  "claims",
      +  "exclusions",
      +  "kpiTargets",
      +  "markets",
      +  "organizationJsonLd",
      +  "personas",
      +  "pillars",
      +  "profile",
      +  "sources"
      +]
  4. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / brandReview
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "appUrl": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "confirmed": {
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      },
      +      "confirmedAt": {
      +        "type": [
      +          "string",
      +          "null"
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "needsRepair": {
      +        "type": [
      +          "string",
      +          "null"
      +        ]
      +      },
      +      "section": {
      +        "enum": [
      +          "voice",
      +          "visual",
      +          "overlay"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "title": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "appUrl",
      +      "confirmed",
      +      "confirmedAt",
      +      "needsRepair",
      +      "section",
      +      "title"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / claims
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "category": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "id": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "sourceId": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "text": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "id",
      +      "text",
      +      "category",
      +      "sourceId"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sources
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "id": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "title": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "url": {
      +        "type": [
      +          "string",
      +          "null"
      +        ]
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "id",
      +      "title",
      +      "url"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "angles",
      -  "appUrl",
      -  "buyerQuestions",
      -  "exclusions",
      -  "kpiTargets",
      -  "markets",
      -  "personas",
      -  "pillars",
      -  "profile"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "angles",
      +  "appUrl",
      +  "brandReview",
      +  "buyerQuestions",
      +  "claims",
      +  "exclusions",
      +  "kpiTargets",
      +  "markets",
      +  "personas",
      +  "pillars",
      +  "profile",
      +  "sources"
      +]
  5. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / exclusions
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {},
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "angles",
      -  "appUrl",
      -  "buyerQuestions",
      -  "kpiTargets",
      -  "markets",
      -  "personas",
      -  "pillars",
      -  "profile"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "angles",
      +  "appUrl",
      +  "buyerQuestions",
      +  "exclusions",
      +  "kpiTargets",
      +  "markets",
      +  "personas",
      +  "pillars",
      +  "profile"
      +]
  6. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, so 'Does not change anything' adds little. However, the description discloses non-obvious behavior: inactive rows are included, null locationCode/languageCode markets are skipped by search checks, organizationJsonLd is null under specific conditions, and claims are the only facts drafts may assert. That is meaningful context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first sentence is well front-loaded, but the body is very long and dense with parenthetical field enumerations that largely restate what an existing output schema would carry. 'Does not change anything' is also redundant against readOnlyHint, so not every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read tool with full annotations and an output schema, the description is more than sufficient — it covers section semantics, error fields, active/inactive handling and inter-tool handoffs. Some of that overlap with the output schema is the only surplus.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so per the rubric the baseline is 4. There is no input surface for the description to clarify, and it correctly adds none.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence names a specific verb (Returns) and resource (everything that shapes content), then enumerates the concrete sections (profile.voice, visual, overlay, offer) and related entities. It is clearly distinguishable from siblings like list_claims and get_content_performance, which it names explicitly as adjacent tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States the trigger plainly ('Call it before drafting or reviewing') and routes the agent to alternatives for specific needs: get_content_performance for KPI actuals, list_claims for retired claims and search, get_asset for the logo image. When-to-use and where-to-go-instead are both covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources