uplika

Get remaining publishing quota

get_quota

Read-only

How much of the 24 hour allowance is already used for posts, replies and deletes. Check this before a burst of publishing. This is live usage from the platform, not the static limits in list_platforms. We also cap how fast one account can publish, so publish can return rate_limited even when the platform allowance still has room.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`accountId`	No	Limit to one account. Omit to cover every connected channel.
`workspaceId`	No	Which workspace this is for. Only needed when the account has more than one — the error tells you the ids when it matters. Leave it out if it is already decided; do not ask the person again.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed1 schema field changedAug 10, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / workspaceId

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Which workspace this is for. Only needed when the account has more than one — the error tells you the ids when it matters. Leave it out if it is already decided; do not ask the person again.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

First observedAug 10, 2026

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this read-only, and the description adds meaningful behavioral context: it reports live platform usage rather than static limits, and it describes an additional account-level rate cap relevant to interpreting publish failures. This goes beyond the annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences with no filler. The core purpose comes first, followed by usage timing and a key differentiation from related tools.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with optional parameters, the description covers purpose, timing, and a subtle behavioral caveat about rate limiting. The lack of an output schema is partly mitigated by the description's clear framing of what the quota represents.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents both optional parameters fully, with 100% schema description coverage. The description adds no parameter-level meaning, but it also doesn't need to since the schema carries that burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific resource (24 hour publishing allowance) and what it reports (usage for posts, replies, deletes). It distinguishes itself from list_platforms and publish, making the tool's role unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent to check this before a burst of publishing, and warns that publish can return rate_limited even when the platform allowance has room. It also names list_platforms as the source of static limits, not this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All uplika tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?