Skip to main content
Glama

Search Listings

search_listings
Read-only

Search real estate listings. Filter by city, price, bedrooms, property type, or a specific agency/company.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cityNoCity name, e.g. "Asunción"
sortNo
limitNoMax 20
companyNoAgency/company NAME to list only their properties, e.g. "RE/MAX Urbana" (resolved automatically; punctuation/accents ignored).
bedroomsNo
buildingNoBuilding/tower NAME to list the actual units for sale/rent in it, e.g. "Petra Tower" (punctuation/accents ignored). Use this — not search_projects — when the user wants the real listings in a named building.
amenitiesNoComma-separated amenities/features the property must have, in the user's own words and language, e.g. "piscina, cochera" or "pool, gym". Common ones: pool/piscina, gym/gimnasio, garden/jardín, balcony/balcón, terrace/terraza, parking/cochera, furnished/amoblado, airConditioning/aire, security/seguridad, elevator/ascensor, bbq/parrilla/quincho, laundry/lavadero. Multiple = must have all.
max_priceNo
min_priceNo
listing_typeNo
neighborhoodNo
property_typeNoapartment, house, land, commercial

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation declares readOnlyHint=true, so the tool is read-only; the description does not contradict this but adds no additional behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and to the point, consisting of two sentences that convey the core function without unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 12 parameters, partial schema documentation, and no output schema, the description is insufficient; it omits details on result format, pagination, or how filters combine.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50%; the description mentions filters generically but doesn't explain all parameters. The schema itself provides some parameter descriptions, but the description adds minimal value beyond that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it searches real estate listings with filters, distinguishing it from sibling tools like search_projects or search_agents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The main description provides no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives; only a parameter hint mentions not using search_projects for building searches.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes covering account management, listings, search, financials, etc. However, `fetch` and `get_listing` both retrieve full listing details, creating potential confusion. Also, `search` and `search_listings` overlap but are differentiated by free-text vs. filtered search.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent `verb_noun` pattern in snake_case (e.g., `create_listing`, `publish_listing`, `connect_account`). The naming is predictable and clear throughout.

Tool Count3/5

At 39 tools, the server is quite large for a real estate domain. While it covers many aspects, some tools like `fetch` and `get_listing` are redundant. The count feels excessive and could be streamlined to around 25-30 without losing functionality.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers listing CRUD, various search types, agent/company profiles, financial calculators, inquiries, saved searches, and account management. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of bulk operations or advanced analytics, but core workflows are well-supported.

Resources