Skip to main content
Glama

List private links

list_private_links
Read-onlyIdempotent

List an event type's private (hashed) booking links with their expiry and usage.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "eventTypeId": "<eventTypeId>"
    },
    "name": "list_private_links"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
eventTypeIdYesNumeric event type ID, as returned by list_event_types.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so safety behavior is well covered. The description adds that returned links include expiry and usage information, but does not mention permissions, pagination, or ordering.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no redundant or filler text. It efficiently states the resource, scope, and included link details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only listing tool with one fully documented required parameter and annotations covering safety, the description is nearly complete. Minor gaps remain around pagination or ordering, but nothing essential is missing for an agent to select and call the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the eventTypeId schema field already explains that it is a numeric event type ID returned by list_event_types. The description reinforces the event-type scope but adds no parameter semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ("List") and resource ("private (hashed) booking links") scoped to an event type. It clearly distinguishes this read operation from sibling mutations such as create_private_link, update_private_link, and delete_private_link.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly establishes the context for use: listing private links belonging to a given event type. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, but the sibling mutation tools make the boundary reasonably clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources