Skip to main content
Glama

Add team to organization

add_team_to_organization

Create a new team inside an organization (admins).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "orgId": "<orgId>",
      "name": "<name>",
      "slug": "<slug>"
    },
    "name": "add_team_to_organization"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bioNo
nameYes
slugYes
orgIdYesOrganization id.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already disclose that this is a non-read-only, non-idempotent, open-world mutation. The description adds that the operation is admin-scoped, but it does not explain side effects, slug uniqueness requirements, or what happens on failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted wording. It states the action, target, and admin scope immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create operation with annotations covering safety traits, the description is minimally adequate. However, given low schema description coverage and the presence of related sibling tools, it should clarify parameter expectations and how it differs from create_team.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25%, with just orgId documented in the schema. The description implies the organization and team context but does not explain the required name, slug, or optional bio parameters or their constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource: create a new team inside an organization. It is clear what the tool does, but it does not explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools such as create_team.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only usage signal is the parenthetical '(admins)', which implies an admin-only operation. There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool instead of create_team or related organization/team tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources