Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaning by explaining that 'grade' is the primary input (with examples like n330, n550) and 'type' is optional, and provides query examples that demonstrate parameter combinations. This goes beyond the schema's simple descriptions, warranting a 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.