Skip to main content
Glama

ToolForte

List saved workflows

workflow_list
Read-onlyIdempotent

List the workflows saved to the ToolForte account this API key belongs to. A workflow runs several ToolForte tools in order, passing each one the output of an earlier step, so it does a whole job in one call instead of you orchestrating the steps yourself. Returns each workflow's id, the inputs it expects, the steps it runs and what a run costs. Call this first: workflow_run needs an id from here. Requires an API key, because a workflow belongs to an account. Get a free key at https://toolforte.com/developers and send it on the MCP connection as the header Authorization: Bearer tf_...

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoHow many to return, newest first.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countNoNumber of items
resultNoThe result, when it is not an object
workflowsNoThe workflows on the account

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "count": {
      +      "description": "Number of items",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "result": {
      +      "description": "The result, when it is not an object"
      +    },
      +    "workflows": {
      +      "description": "The workflows on the account",
      +      "items": {},
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      -  "additionalProperties": {},
      -  "properties": {
      -    "count": {
      -      "description": "Number of items",
      -      "type": "number"
      -    },
      -    "result": {
      -      "description": "The result, when it is not an object"
      -    },
      -    "workflows": {
      -      "description": "The workflows on the account",
      -      "items": {},
      -      "type": "array"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "count": {
      +      "description": "Number of items",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "result": {
      +      "description": "The result, when it is not an object"
      +    },
      +    "workflows": {
      +      "description": "The workflows on the account",
      +      "items": {},
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already carry the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world), so the bar is lower; the description still adds account scoping, the authentication mechanism and exact header format. It doesn't mention pagination limits or rate limits beyond the schema's 'limit' field.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the purpose and the ordering directive, with no wasted sentences. The developer-signup URL and API-key marketing line are slightly promotional but do carry the auth requirement, so they mostly earn their place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An agent knows what it returns (ids, inputs, steps, cost), that it needs an API key and how to send it, and that it must be called before workflow_run. With an output schema present the return-value detail is a bonus rather than a gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single 'limit' parameter is documented there ('how many to return, newest first'). The description adds no parameter detail, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('List the workflows saved to the ToolForte account this API key belongs to') and then explains what a workflow actually is, which is not inferable from the name. It also implicitly separates itself from workflow_run and workflow_propose by describing the orchestration model.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit call-order directive: 'Call this first: workflow_run needs an id from here,' which is exactly the routing an agent needs. It does not say when NOT to use it or contrast with workflow_propose, so it stops short of full coverage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources