Skip to main content
Glama

get_stock_quotes

Read-onlyIdempotent

Real-time price quote for one or more stocks or ETFs.

Returns price, intraday OHLC, day change (amount + percent), volume,
previous close, market cap, currency, exchange, and market-state
flags (is_market_open / is_premarket / is_after_market). When
extended-hours data is present, the entry includes a
`pre_post_market` block — when the regular session is closed,
that's the freshest price.

For forex pairs use get_forex_quote; this endpoint is stocks/ETFs only.

Args:
    tickers: Comma-separated tickers (e.g. 'AAPL' or 'AAPL,MSFT,NVDA').

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tickersYes

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, covering safety. The description adds valuable behavioral context such as the `pre_post_market` block and market-state flags, explaining that extended-hours data may be freshest when the regular session is closed. This goes beyond annotations but does not mention error behaviors or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured: a one-line purpose, a concise list of return fields, a clear alternative note, and an Args section. Every sentence serves a purpose, and the formatting makes it easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While there is no output schema, the description thoroughly enumerates the returned fields and explains the extended-hours context. It covers the key nuances of the tool (market-state flags, pre/post market) and provides sibling differentiation. Minor omissions like error handling are not critical for this read-only tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage for the sole parameter 'tickers', so the description must compensate. It explains that tickers are comma-separated and gives examples ('AAPL' or 'AAPL,MSFT,NVDA'), but it does not mention that the schema also accepts an array, and it omits details like case sensitivity or invalid ticker handling. Thus it adds some meaning but is not fully comprehensive.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Real-time price quote for one or more stocks or ETFs.' It clearly distinguishes from siblings by explicitly noting 'For forex pairs use get_forex_quote; this endpoint is stocks/ETFs only.' This makes the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit usage guidance by naming an alternative tool for forex pairs ('For forex pairs use get_forex_quote') and states the scope limitation ('stocks/ETFs only'). This helps an agent choose this tool over related quote tools for other asset classes.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

Many tools have overlapping purposes, e.g. get_etf_analysis vs get_etf_forecast both provide ETF analyst consensus, get_etf_holdings vs get_etf_top_stocks both list constituents, and get_portfolio_overview vs get_portfolio_performance both return returns/performance. The detailed descriptions help, but the sheer number of similar tools creates ambiguity in selection.

Naming Consistency4/5

The set is largely consistent with a 'get_' prefix and descriptive nouns (get_stock_quotes, get_crypto_quote, get_dividend_history). Minor deviations include 'list_my_portfolios' instead of 'get_my_portfolios' and singular/plural variants like get_all_commodities_quotes vs get_commodity_quote, but the pattern remains predictable.

Tool Count1/5

With 71 tools, the count far exceeds the 50+ threshold described as an extreme mismatch. Even though the server covers a broad financial domain, such a large surface is overwhelming for an agent and includes many redundant or highly specific tools that could be consolidated.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides comprehensive coverage of TipRanks data: quotes and historical data for all major asset classes, news, earnings and economic calendars, analyst and sentiment data, financial statements, technical analysis, options, portfolios, and screeners. There are no obvious dead ends for typical financial research tasks.

Resources