Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

The Deployer

by com.thedploy
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Account and connections

account
Read-onlyIdempotent

Who the connection acts for, what it may do (Operate or Limited), the connected cloud accounts and code hosts with their ids, the workspaces the person is a member of, and how many projects they can see. Changes nothing.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "account"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceNoA teammate's workspace id. Default: your own.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / workspace / description
      Previous value: -"Act in a teammate's workspace: its id from account. Default: your own."New value: +"A teammate's workspace id. Default: your own."
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, and openWorldHint=false. The description adds that it 'Changes nothing,' which mostly repeats the safety profile, and it does not disclose auth requirements, rate limits, or response format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is compact and front-loads the returned information in a single structured sentence. The final sentence is redundant with the readOnly annotation, but the overall description remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully enumerates the key data returned: identity, permissions, connected accounts, workspace memberships, and project count. It is complete enough for a simple read-only tool, though it omits parameter usage guidance that the schema supplies.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the optional workspace parameter is fully documented in the schema. The description does not mention the parameter or add meaning beyond the schema, which is the expected baseline when schema coverage is high.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly enumerates the resource: account identity, permission level, connected cloud accounts and code hosts, workspace memberships, and visible project count. It is specific about what information the tool returns, though it does not explicitly differentiate itself from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as project or api. The phrase 'Changes nothing' implies a safe read, but the description does not state use cases or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All The Deployer toolsInspect
Try in Browser
Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources