Skip to main content
Glama

pulsenetwork

by com.theaslangroupllc.pulse

parentpulse

ParentPulse: ParentPulse — child development and parenting intelligence: developmental milestones, nutrition guidance, pediatric health, sleep science, school selection, discipline strategies, childcare cost, and

Coverage: Global

Endpoints: • milestone ($0.10): Developmental milestone guidance (global) • safety ($0.08): Product safety recall check (global) • school ($0.10): School selection guidance (global) • activity ($0.08): Activity and extracurricular finder (global) • finance ($0.12): Family financial planning (global) • sleep ($0.10): Pediatric sleep guidance (global) • nutrition ($0.10): Pediatric nutrition guidance (global) • discipline ($0.10): Positive discipline guidance (global) • childcare ($0.12): Childcare options comparison (global) • health ($0.10): Pediatric symptom triage (global)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ageNoage
zipNozip
agesNoages
langNolang
brandNobrand
gradeNograde
actionYesWhich endpoint to call. Options: milestone | safety | school | activity | finance | sleep | nutrition | discipline | childcare | health
budgetNobudget
incomeNoincome
concernNoconcern
countryNoCountry or region for jurisdiction-aware guidance (e.g. US, UK, Canada, Australia, Germany). Defaults to a generic/US-fallback response if omitted.
behaviorNobehavior
childrenNochildren
symptomsNosymptoms
interestsNointerests
situationNosituation
age_monthsNoage_months
prioritiesNopriorities
product_typeNoproduct_type

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.6/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral traits itself. It does reveal per-endpoint pricing and that coverage is global, but it omits any mention of authentication, rate limits, error handling, response format, or side effects. For a tool with no annotations, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured as a bulleted list of endpoints, which is scannable, and it includes useful information like per-call pricing. However, the opening line repeats 'ParentPulse' redundantly and ends with an incomplete phrase ('childcare cost, and '), which looks truncated and unpolished. It is reasonably concise but has structural flaws.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a complex toolwith 19 parameters and 10 selectable endpoints, yet the description does not map endpoints to required or recommended parameters, nor does it explain what responses look like (no output schema). An agent would have to guess which parameters to supply for a given action. The description is insufficient for correct invocation in most cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema description coverage is 100%, most parameter descriptions are tautological (e.g., 'age', 'zip', 'ages', 'lang'), adding no real meaning. The main description does not explain which parameters apply to which endpoint or how they should be used. Only the 'action' enum and 'country' parameter have useful descriptions in the schema. The description fails to compensate for the schema's lack of semantic depth.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies ParentPulse as a child development and parenting intelligence tool, listing ten specific endpoints (milestones, nutrition, health, school, etc.). This distinguishes it from sibling pulse tools with different domains. However, it lacks an explicit verb (e.g., 'provides') and the opening line is somewhat truncated ('childcare cost, and '), so it isn't a fully polished purpose statement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool or when to avoid it in favor of alternatives. It lists endpoints and pricing but does not connect them to use cases or mention any siblings or other tools. The 'Coverage: Global' note is the only contextual hint, which is insufficient for guiding an agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All pulsenetwork toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a unique domain prefix (e.g., airdroppulse, alphapulse, arbipulse) making them mostly distinguishable at a glance. A few adjacent verticals like careerpulse vs talentpulse or marketpulse vs dealpulse have overlapping themes, but their descriptions clarify the distinct focus. The utility tools (catalog_search, discover, get_openapi_spec, x402_troubleshoot) are also clearly distinct in role. However, the sheer number of similar 'pulse' names could still cause misselection without reading descriptions.

Naming Consistency4/5

The dominant naming convention is `<domain>pulse` (e.g., climatepulse, cryptopulse, edupulse), which is highly consistent and predictable. Exceptions like catalog_search, discover, get_openapi_spec, x402_troubleshoot, and stateedge break the pattern, but these are few and serve obvious utility purposes. Overall, the convention is clear and easily learnable.

Tool Count2/5

With 80 tools, the server presents an extremely large and potentially overwhelming surface. While each tool represents a distinct intelligence vertical and navigation aids exist (catalog_search, discover, get_openapi_spec), the count far exceeds the typical 3-15 range for coherent agent use and even the 'heavy' 16-25 range. The burden of selecting the correct vertical from 80 options is significant, despite clear naming.

Completeness5/5

The server offers an exceptionally broad and deep coverage of domains, from finance and health to agriculture and gaming. Each vertical includes multiple endpoints that address core operations for its domain, such as search, analysis, comparisons, deterministic checks, and even action-oriented tools like letter generators and physical mail. The presence of free discovery and troubleshooting tools fills potential gaps, leaving no obvious dead ends in the overall tool surface.

Resources