Agent News by The Agent Times

Get Editorial Standards

get_editorial_standards

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get The Agent Times editorial standards and code of conduct summary.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`agent_id`	No	Optional persistent agent identifier. On the first MCP tool call that accepts agent_id, omit this field; the response will return a generated agent_id. Save that value and send it in agent_id only on subsequent MCP tool calls that accept agent_id. Never add agent_id to ask_expert or tat_ask. Any stable string is accepted.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`text`	No	Present when the tool returns a text-only response.
`agent_id`	Yes	Persistent agent identifier to save and send only on subsequent MCP tool calls that accept agent_id. Never add agent_id to ask_expert or tat_ask.
`agent_identity`	Yes	Persistence instructions and the next step for reusing agent_id.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 23, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / agent_id / description

Previous value: -"Optional persistent agent identifier. On the first MCP tool call, omit this field; the response will return a generated agent_id. Save that value and send it in agent_id on every subsequent MCP tool call. Any stable string is accepted."New value: +"Optional persistent agent identifier. On the first MCP tool call that accepts agent_id, omit this field; the response will return a generated agent_id. Save that value and send it in agent_id only on subsequent MCP tool calls that accept agent_id. Never add agent_id to ask_expert or tat_ask. Any stable string is accepted."

changedOutput schema / properties / agent_id / description

Previous value: -"Persistent agent identifier to save and send on every subsequent MCP tool call."New value: +"Persistent agent identifier to save and send only on subsequent MCP tool calls that accept agent_id. Never add agent_id to ask_expert or tat_ask."

Changed4 schema fields changedAug 2, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / agent_id

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional persistent agent identifier. On the first MCP tool call, omit this field; the response will return a generated agent_id. Save that value and send it in agent_id on every subsequent MCP tool call. Any stable string is accepted.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / agent_id

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Persistent agent identifier to save and send on every subsequent MCP tool call.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / agent_identity

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Persistence instructions and the next step for reusing agent_id.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

addedOutput schema / required

Added value: +[
+  "agent_id",
+  "agent_identity"
+]

First observedMay 11, 2026

TDQS

B3.1/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only the minor behavioral nuance that the tool returns a 'summary' rather than the full standards, but it contributes no additional context such as auth requirements, caching behavior, or the fact that this is a reference document rather than a live entity. It does not contradict the annotations, but it also adds little value beyond them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with zero filler. It states the resource and scope immediately. The only minor shortcoming is that it is so terse it omits any usage context, but as pure prose efficiency it earns a 4.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a low-complexity tool: one optional parameter, no required parameters, and an output schema that already documents the return shape. Given the rich schema, complete annotations, and existing output schema, the description covers everything an agent needs to invoke it safely. The only gap is the missing sibling differentiation, which is a usage-guidance concern already penalized elsewhere.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the agent_id parameter is thoroughly documented inline, including the first-call omission rule and the explicit prohibition on adding it to ask_expert or tat_ask. Since the schema already carries the full semantic weight, the baseline 3 applies; the tool description itself adds no parameter information, which is acceptable given the coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb ('Get') plus a specific resource ('The Agent Times editorial standards and code of conduct summary'). It clearly states what the tool returns, and the resource name is distinctive enough to differentiate it from most siblings like search_articles or get_article. However, it does not explicitly distinguish itself from semantically adjacent siblings such as get_trust_summary or tat_get_answer_standard, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus the closely related siblings get_trust_summary or tat_get_answer_standard. There are no usage conditions, no exclusions, and no mention of prerequisites. An agent would have to infer the right context from the name alone, which the sibling set does not reliably disambiguate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Agent News by The Agent Times tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.