Skip to main content
Glama
This connector has been deprecated

Replaced by Teppek.

Duplicate listing. Use the main Teppek connector.

set_listing_status

Idempotent

Change the lifecycle status of one of the USER'S OWN listings: mark it sold, hide it (take it offline), or re-activate a hidden one. Free — no credit charge. Cannot set moderation states (pending/rejected); re-activating only works on a listing that was previously approved and is currently hidden.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statusYessold = mark the listing sold/closed; hidden = temporarily take a live listing offline; active = re-show a listing that is currently hidden (only works if it was previously approved). Cannot set moderation states.
listing_idYesListing id, taken from the `id` field of search_listings, semantic_search or list_my_listings results. Example: "adzuna-us-5947308680".

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
listingYes
successYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed14 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / listing_id / description
      Added value: +"Listing id, taken from the `id` field of search_listings, semantic_search or list_my_listings results. Example: \"adzuna-us-5947308680\"."
    • changedOutput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • removedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / currency / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / currency / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / price / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "number"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / price / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / status / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / status / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / title / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / title / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • removedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / vertical / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / listing / properties / vertical / type
      Added value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "listing": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {
      +        "currency": {
      +          "anyOf": [
      +            {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            {
      +              "type": "null"
      +            }
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "id": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "price": {
      +          "anyOf": [
      +            {
      +              "type": "number"
      +            },
      +            {
      +              "type": "null"
      +            }
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "status": {
      +          "anyOf": [
      +            {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            {
      +              "type": "null"
      +            }
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "title": {
      +          "anyOf": [
      +            {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            {
      +              "type": "null"
      +            }
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "url": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "vertical": {
      +          "anyOf": [
      +            {
      +              "type": "string"
      +            },
      +            {
      +              "type": "null"
      +            }
      +          ]
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "listing"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare non-destructive, idempotent, non-read-only behavior, so the bar is lower; the description adds real value with 'Free — no credit charge' and the hard constraint that moderation states cannot be set. It stops short of describing failure behavior (e.g. setting active on an already-active listing) or what happens to the listing's visibility/searchability.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences, front-loaded with the action and scope, followed by cost and constraints. No filler or restatement of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need no explanation, and annotations cover the safety profile. The cost note and state-transition preconditions fill the remaining gaps; only error/edge-case behavior is left implicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the enum already documents status semantics, so the description's status explanation is largely duplicative. The only added semantics is the ownership restriction implied by 'USER'S OWN listings', which the schema's listing_id description does not state.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (change lifecycle status) applied to a specific resource (one of the USER'S OWN listings), and enumerates the three target states. Ownership scoping plus the 'cannot set moderation states' line clearly separates it from delete_listing and update_listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains each state's meaning in actionable terms ('hide it (take it offline)', 're-activate a hidden one') and the precondition for reactivation (previously approved, currently hidden). It does not, however, name sibling alternatives such as delete_listing or renew_listing to route the agent explicitly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources