Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents limit, offset, and every enum value of status in detail. The description's pending/rejected hints restate what the schema's status description already says, adding no new syntax, defaults, or edge-case meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.