Skip to main content
Glama

list_my_listings

Read-only

List the user's OWN listings (any status), newest first. Resolved from the authenticated agent key — only ever returns this user's listings. Use status='pending' to see what is awaiting moderation, status='rejected' for declined ones.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum results to return per page, 1-50. Default 20. Example: 10.
offsetNoHow many results to skip, for paging. Default 0. Example: 20 returns the second page when limit is 20.
statusNoFilter YOUR listings by moderation/lifecycle status. Use "pending" to see what is awaiting AI moderation, "rejected" for declined ones, "all" (default) for everything.all

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
successYes
listingsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Maximum results to return per page, 1-50. Default 20. Example: 10."
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset / description
      Added value: +"How many results to skip, for paging. Default 0. Example: 20 returns the second page when limit is 20."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "properties": {
      +    "listings": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": {},
      +        "properties": {
      +          "currency": {
      +            "anyOf": [
      +              {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              {
      +                "type": "null"
      +              }
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "id": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "price": {
      +            "anyOf": [
      +              {
      +                "type": "number"
      +              },
      +              {
      +                "type": "null"
      +              }
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "status": {
      +            "anyOf": [
      +              {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              {
      +                "type": "null"
      +              }
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "title": {
      +            "anyOf": [
      +              {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              {
      +                "type": "null"
      +              }
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "url": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "vertical": {
      +            "anyOf": [
      +              {
      +                "type": "string"
      +              },
      +              {
      +                "type": "null"
      +              }
      +            ]
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "listings"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered; the description adds genuinely new behavioral facts beyond that — results are scoped to the authenticated agent key, ownership is enforced server-side, and ordering is newest-first. It does not discuss pagination limits or what the response envelope looks like, but an output schema exists to cover returns.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, zero filler, and the most consequential constraint (own listings only, agent-key resolved) is front-loaded before the filter hints. Every sentence carries distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only three optional, fully documented parameters, an output schema for return values, and annotations covering the safety profile, the description supplies exactly the missing piece: ownership scoping and the authenticated-key resolution model. Nothing an agent needs to invoke this correctly is absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents limit, offset, and every enum value of status in detail. The description's pending/rejected hints restate what the schema's status description already says, adding no new syntax, defaults, or edge-case meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (list listings) plus the crucial scope qualifier: only the caller's OWN listings, keyed to the authenticated agent. The 'any status, newest first' clause and the emphasis on ownership distinguish it cleanly from sibling tools like search_listings and get_listing without needing to open either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete selection guidance for the status filter ('use pending to see what is awaiting moderation, rejected for declined ones') and establishes the ownership precondition that tells the agent when this tool applies at all. It stops short of naming an explicit alternative for cross-user lookup (e.g., search_listings), so no exclusion is stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources