Skip to main content
Glama

Synthex Forge — x402 Paid Agent Services

Get Payment Deadline

get_payment_deadline
Read-onlyIdempotent

Will this payment settle inside my deadline?. use it rather than settle_conditional_payment for payment deadline, not conditional payment; an object with 29 fields including _time_dependent, algorithm. $0.05 USDC.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
railYesThe rail this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
networkYesThe network this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
deadlineYesThe deadline, as an ISO-8601 timestamp.
amount_usdYesThe amount in USD. The settlement rail converts it to the exact atomic amount.
submitted_atYesThe submitted at this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tsNoThe `ts` field of the response.
noteNoA note on how the answer was produced.
railNoThe `rail` field of the response.
basisNoThe `basis` field of the response.
valueNoThe `value` field of the response.
detailYesHuman-readable explanation of the verdict.
sampleNoThe `sample` field of the response.
sha256NoThe `sha256` field of the response.
networkNoThe `network` field of the response.
reasonsNoThe `reasons` field of the response.
verdictYesThe decision this tool returned.
deadlineNoThe `deadline` field of the response.
algorithmNoThe `algorithm` field of the response.
amount_usdNoThe amount the operation concerned.
instrumentNoThe `instrument` field of the response.
public_keyNoThe `public_key` field of the response.
measured_atNoThe `measured_at` field of the response.
p50_secondsNoThe `p50_seconds` field of the response.
p95_secondsNoThe `p95_seconds` field of the response.
signed_overNoThe `signed_over` field of the response.
received_usdNoThe `received_usd` field of the response.
submitted_atNoThe `submitted_at` field of the response.
amount_atomicNoThe `amount_atomic` field of the response.
coverage_gapsNoThe `coverage_gaps` field of the response.
slack_secondsNoThe `slack_seconds` field of the response.
profileVersionNoVersion of the answer profile.
settle_secondsNoThe `settle_seconds` field of the response.
_time_dependentNoThe `_time_dependent` field of the response.
expected_settlement_secondsNoThe `expected_settlement_seconds` field of the response.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed31 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _time_dependent
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `_time_dependent` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / algorithm
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `algorithm` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / amount_atomic
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `amount_atomic` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / amount_usd
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The amount the operation concerned.",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / basis
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `basis` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / coverage_gaps
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `coverage_gaps` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / deadline
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `deadline` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / detail
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Human-readable explanation of the verdict.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / expected_settlement_seconds
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `expected_settlement_seconds` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / instrument
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `instrument` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / measured_at
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `measured_at` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / network
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `network` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / note
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "A note on how the answer was produced.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / p50_seconds
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `p50_seconds` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / p95_seconds
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `p95_seconds` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / profileVersion
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Version of the answer profile.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / public_key
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `public_key` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / rail
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `rail` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reasons
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `reasons` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / received_usd
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `received_usd` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sample
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `sample` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / settle_seconds
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `settle_seconds` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sha256
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `sha256` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / signed_over
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `signed_over` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / slack_seconds
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `slack_seconds` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / status
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / submitted_at
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `submitted_at` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / ts
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `ts` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / value
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `value` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / verdict
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The decision this tool returned.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "detail",
      +  "verdict"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful context beyond that: the response is a 29-field object including `_time_dependent` and `algorithm`, and the call costs $0.05 USDC — cost information an agent cannot get from annotations or schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short and front-loads the purpose question, but it is written as three stitched-together fragments separated by semicolons, with redundancy in 'for payment deadline, not conditional payment.' The middle clause costs reading effort without adding clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be enumerated, yet the description still hints at output shape (29 fields, `_time_dependent`, `algorithm`) and discloses pricing. For a read-only query tool with full schema coverage, that is close to sufficient; only the parameter semantics are thin.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. However, several schema descriptions are boilerplate ('See the schema for its type and whether it is required'), and the description adds nothing about `rail`, `network`, `submitted_at`, or `deadline`, so it neither compensates nor detracts.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states its purpose as a question ('Will this payment settle inside my deadline?') rather than a verb+resource, which conveys the concept (settlement-feasibility check) but leaves the agent to infer the actual operation. The sibling exclusion for `settle_conditional_payment` helps disambiguate, but the phrasing is fragmentary and the word 'deadline' is used both as the tool's subject and as a contrast term, muddying the signal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly names an alternative and a condition: use this rather than `settle_conditional_payment` when you want a payment deadline answer, not a conditional payment. That is real routing guidance, though the sentence is grammatically tangled and never says when this tool should not be used at all.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.