Skip to main content
Glama

Synthex Forge — x402 Paid Agent Services

Extract Sec Filing

extract_sec_filing
Read-onlyIdempotent

Sec Extract. use it rather than extract_contract_terms for sec filing, not contract terms; an object with 20 fields including Accept-Encoding, User-Agent. $0.05 USDC.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tickerNoThe ticker this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cikNoThe `cik` field of the response.
sicNoThe `sic` field of the response.
formNoThe `form` field of the response.
noteNoA note on how the answer was produced.
detailYesHuman-readable explanation of the verdict.
tickerNoThe `ticker` field of the response.
cik_intNoThe `cik_int` field of the response.
websiteNoThe `website` field of the response.
sourceUrlNoThe `sourceUrl` field of the response.
User-AgentNoThe `User-Agent` field of the response.
dataSourceNoThe `dataSource` field of the response.
filingDateNoThe `filingDate` field of the response.
reportDateNoThe `reportDate` field of the response.
companyNameNoThe `companyName` field of the response.
fetchedAtUtcNoThe `fetchedAtUtc` field of the response.
fiscalYearEndNoThe `fiscalYearEnd` field of the response.
sicDescriptionNoThe `sicDescription` field of the response.
Accept-EncodingNoThe `Accept-Encoding` field of the response.
latestPeriodicFilingNoThe `latestPeriodicFiling` field of the response.
stateOfIncorporationNoThe `stateOfIncorporation` field of the response.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed22 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / Accept-Encoding
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `Accept-Encoding` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / User-Agent
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `User-Agent` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / cik
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `cik` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / cik_int
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `cik_int` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / companyName
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `companyName` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / dataSource
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `dataSource` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / detail
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Human-readable explanation of the verdict.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / fetchedAtUtc
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `fetchedAtUtc` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / filingDate
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `filingDate` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / fiscalYearEnd
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `fiscalYearEnd` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / form
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `form` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / latestPeriodicFiling
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `latestPeriodicFiling` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / note
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "A note on how the answer was produced.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reportDate
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `reportDate` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sic
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `sic` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sicDescription
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `sicDescription` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sourceUrl
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `sourceUrl` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / stateOfIncorporation
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `stateOfIncorporation` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / status
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / ticker
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `ticker` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / website
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `website` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "detail"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, closed-world, non-destructive behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely useful context — a $0.05 USDC cost — but the remainder ("an object with 20 fields including Accept-Encoding, User-Agent") is opaque and looks like raw header metadata rather than meaningful behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but the fragments are not front-loaded coherently — cost, routing, and return shape are jammed into one semicolon chain, and the "Accept-Encoding, User-Agent" clause adds noise rather than signal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return documentation isn't strictly required, yet the description muddies it with a confusing field sample. For a paid extraction tool the agent still lacks the essentials: what filing content is returned, and whether payment authorization must be arranged beforehand.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is a single `ticker` parameter with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema carries the burden and baseline 3 applies. The description says nothing about the ticker's format, case sensitivity, or what happens when it's omitted (it's optional with an empty default).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Sec Extract" largely restates the title, but the phrase "for sec filing, not contract terms" does identify the resource and separate it from extract_contract_terms. An agent can infer it extracts data from SEC filings, though the description never states the action or what is extracted explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly routes the agent: use this rather than `extract_contract_terms` for SEC filings, not contract terms. This is a clear selection rule against the closest sibling, though no further conditions (e.g., filing types, when extraction is needed) are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.