Skip to main content
Glama

Synthex Forge — x402 Paid Agent Services

Check Compliance Status

check_compliance_status
Destructive

Compliance Check. use it rather than check_licence_status for compliance status, not licence status; an object with 34 fields including algorithm, applicable_obligations. $1 USDC.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoThe name this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.AI use case
usersNoThe users this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
sectorNoThe sector this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
purposeNoThe purpose this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
categoryNoThe category this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
providerNoThe provider this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
data_typesNoThe data types this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
descriptionNoThe description this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
custom_detailsNoThe custom details this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
kindNoThe `kind` field of the response.
nameNoThe `name` field of the response.
noteNoA note on how the answer was produced.
tierNoThe `tier` field of the response.
assetNoThe `asset` field of the response.
labelNoThe `label` field of the response.
usersNoThe `users` field of the response.
detailYesHuman-readable explanation of the verdict.
sectorNoThe `sector` field of the response.
sha256NoThe `sha256` field of the response.
framingNoThe `framing` field of the response.
purposeNoThe `purpose` field of the response.
receiptNoThe `receipt` field of the response.
categoryNoThe `category` field of the response.
providerNoThe `provider` field of the response.
signedByNoThe `signedBy` field of the response.
algorithmNoThe `algorithm` field of the response.
rationaleNoThe `rationale` field of the response.
signatureYesThe Ed25519 signature over the evidence core, base64-encoded.
assessedAtNoThe `assessedAt` field of the response.
assessmentNoThe `assessment` field of the response.
data_typesNoThe `data_types` field of the response.
disclaimerNoThe `disclaimer` field of the response.
referencesNoThe `references` field of the response.
descriptionNoThe `description` field of the response.
publicKeyHexNoThe `publicKeyHex` field of the response.
risk_registerNoThe `risk_register` field of the response.
custom_detailsNoThe `custom_details` field of the response.
canonicalSha256NoThe `canonicalSha256` field of the response.
reproducibilityNoThe `reproducibility` field of the response.
verificationHintNoThe `verificationHint` field of the response.
assessment_summaryNoThe `assessment_summary` field of the response.
risk_classificationNoThe `risk_classification` field of the response.
applicable_obligationsNoThe `applicable_obligations` field of the response.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed36 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / algorithm
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `algorithm` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / applicable_obligations
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `applicable_obligations` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / assessedAt
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `assessedAt` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / assessment
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `assessment` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / assessment_summary
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `assessment_summary` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / asset
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `asset` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / canonicalSha256
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `canonicalSha256` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / category
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `category` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / custom_details
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `custom_details` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data_types
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `data_types` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / description
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `description` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / detail
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Human-readable explanation of the verdict.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `disclaimer` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / framing
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `framing` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / kind
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `kind` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / label
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `label` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / name
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `name` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / note
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "A note on how the answer was produced.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / provider
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `provider` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / publicKeyHex
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `publicKeyHex` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / purpose
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `purpose` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / rationale
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `rationale` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / receipt
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `receipt` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / references
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `references` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reproducibility
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `reproducibility` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / risk_classification
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `risk_classification` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / risk_register
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `risk_register` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sector
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `sector` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sha256
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `sha256` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / signature
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The Ed25519 signature over the evidence core, base64-encoded.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / signedBy
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `signedBy` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / status
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / tier
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `tier` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / users
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `users` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / verificationHint
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `verificationHint` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "detail",
      +  "signature"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

It adds two things annotations cannot: the call costs $1 USDC and returns an object with 34 fields including algorithm and applicable_obligations. However, annotations declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=false, while the description frames the operation as a plain 'Check' — an agent could easily read this as a harmless read and never learn what is destructive, what is consumed besides the $1, or that repeated calls are not idempotent (and each may cost again).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but it is a single run-on sentence chaining four unrelated ideas (purpose, sibling routing, return shape, price) with semicolons, so nothing is clearly front-loaded beyond the two-word 'Compliance Check'. The return-shape detail is largely redundant given an output schema exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Annotations and an output schema carry most of the structural burden, and the description covers the routing decision and the price — the two things structured data does not. The remaining gap is the unexplained destructive/non-idempotent behavior for something the name calls a 'check'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is nominally 100%, so the baseline of 3 applies. The description contributes nothing about the nine inputs (name, users, sector, purpose, category, provider, data_types, description, custom_details), all of which are optional with empty-string defaults and boilerplate schema prose, so the agent gets no guidance on which fields actually matter or how they affect the result.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource (compliance status) and verb (check), and explicitly separates it from the nearest sibling, check_licence_status, which is a real differentiation an agent can act on. It stops short of saying which compliance domain applies (the 'AI use case' default in the schema hints at AI-governance compliance, but the prose never says so).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit either/or rule: use this rather than check_licence_status for compliance status, not licence status. That is a genuine routing instruction with an exclusion. It does not say what inputs are required to get a meaningful result or what preconditions (e.g., the payment) must hold before calling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.