Skip to main content
Glama

Synthex Forge — x402 Paid Agent Services

Assess Quant Overlap

assess_quant_overlap
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return ONE signed, dated overlap matrix. use it rather than assess_market_regime for quant overlap, not market regime; an object with 27 fields including a, as_of. $0.1 USDC.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
as_ofNoThe date the answer is computed as of (YYYY-MM-DD). Defaults to today. Use it to reproduce a past answer exactly.
thresholdNoThe threshold this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.
strategiesNoThe strategies this operation operates on. See the schema for its type and whether it is required.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
aNoThe `a` field of the response.
bNoThe `b` field of the response.
idNoThe `id` field of the response.
corrNoThe `corr` field of the response.
noteNoA note on how the answer was produced.
as_ofNoThe date the answer is computed as of.
detailYesHuman-readable explanation of the verdict.
key_idNoThe `key_id` field of the response.
matrixNoThe `matrix` field of the response.
reasonsNoThe `reasons` field of the response.
returnsNoThe `returns` field of the response.
verdictYesThe decision this tool returned.
clustersNoThe `clusters` field of the response.
signatureYesThe Ed25519 signature over the evidence core, base64-encoded.
signed_byNoThe key id that signed the answer.
thresholdNoThe `threshold` field of the response.
public_keyNoThe `public_key` field of the response.
observationsNoThe `observations` field of the response.
coverage_gapsNoThe `coverage_gaps` field of the response.
crowded_pairsNoThe `crowded_pairs` field of the response.
evidence_coreYesThe canonical, signed core of the answer — the payload the signature covers.
output_sha256YesSHA-256 hex digest of the canonical evidence core.
pairs_measuredNoThe `pairs_measured` field of the response.
strategy_countNoThe `strategy_count` field of the response.
canonicalizationNoThe canonicalisation rule the digest was computed under.
insufficient_pairsNoThe `insufficient_pairs` field of the response.
signature_algorithmNoThe `signature_algorithm` field of the response.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed29 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / a
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `a` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / as_of
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The date the answer is computed as of.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / b
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `b` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / canonicalization
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The canonicalisation rule the digest was computed under.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / clusters
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `clusters` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / corr
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `corr` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / coverage_gaps
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `coverage_gaps` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / crowded_pairs
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `crowded_pairs` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / detail
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Human-readable explanation of the verdict.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / evidence_core
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The canonical, signed core of the answer — the payload the signature covers.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `id` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / insufficient_pairs
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `insufficient_pairs` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / key_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `key_id` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / matrix
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `matrix` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / note
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "A note on how the answer was produced.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / observations
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `observations` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / output_sha256
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "SHA-256 hex digest of the canonical evidence core.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / pairs_measured
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `pairs_measured` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / public_key
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `public_key` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reasons
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `reasons` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / returns
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `returns` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / signature
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The Ed25519 signature over the evidence core, base64-encoded.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / signature_algorithm
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `signature_algorithm` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / signed_by
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The key id that signed the answer.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / status
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / strategy_count
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `strategy_count` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / threshold
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `threshold` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / verdict
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The decision this tool returned.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "detail",
      +  "evidence_core",
      +  "output_sha256",
      +  "signature",
      +  "verdict"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover safety (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive), and the description adds genuinely new context: the result is signed and dated, a single matrix is returned, and the call costs $0.1 USDC — a payment trait no annotation conveys. It stops short of saying whether reproducibility depends on as_of or what 'signed' attests to.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Compact and front-loaded: purpose first, then sibling routing, then output shape and price. The semicolon-clause 'an object with 27 fields including a, as_of' is awkward and truncated, slightly undercutting the structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so the field enumeration is redundant but harmless; the cost disclosure and sibling routing are the pieces an agent actually needs. What 'overlap' measures and how threshold alters the matrix is left implicit, but the schema carries those parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so as_of, threshold, and strategies are already documented in the schema, including as_of's reproducibility use. The description mentions as_of only as an output field, adding nothing about threshold semantics or what strategies overlap is measured against. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb and resource ('Return ONE signed, dated overlap matrix') and distinguishes itself from the sibling it is most likely confused with, assess_market_regime. The trailing 'including a, as_of' field list is garbled and adds noise rather than clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly names the alternative (assess_market_regime) and the condition that selects this tool instead ('for quant overlap, not market regime'). An agent can route between the two without opening either schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.