Skip to main content
Glama

Synthex Forge — x402 Paid Agent Services

Assess Grant Eligibility

assess_grant_eligibility
Read-onlyIdempotent

Is this applicant eligible for this grant?. use it rather than assess_tender_eligibility for grant eligibility, not tender eligibility; an object with 38 fields including applicant_id, comparator. $0.25 USDC.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
criteriaNoThe criteria the eligibility decision is measured against.
evidenceNoThe evidence supporting the claim, as a list of named documents or URLs.
applicant_idNoThe applicant's identifier.
jurisdictionNoThe jurisdiction the answer applies to. Accepts an ISO-3166 alpha-2 code or a country name.
applicant_documentsNoThe applicant's supporting documents.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
gapNoThe `gap` field of the response.
metNoThe `met` field of the response.
kindNoThe `kind` field of the response.
typeNoThe `type` field of the response.
quoteNoThe `quote` field of the response.
valueNoThe `value` field of the response.
countsNoThe `counts` field of the response.
detailYesHuman-readable explanation of the verdict.
reasonNoWhy the verdict was reached.
not_metNoThe `not_met` field of the response.
unclearNoThe `unclear` field of the response.
verdictYesThe decision this tool returned.
criteriaNoThe `criteria` field of the response.
documentNoThe `document` field of the response.
expectedNoThe `expected` field of the response.
exceptionNoThe `exception` field of the response.
mandatoryNoThe `mandatory` field of the response.
thresholdNoThe `threshold` field of the response.
comparatorNoThe `comparator` field of the response.
comparisonNoThe `comparison` field of the response.
descriptionNoThe `description` field of the response.
applicant_idNoThe `applicant_id` field of the response.
criterion_idNoThe `criterion_id` field of the response.
jurisdictionNoThe `jurisdiction` field of the response.
unverifiableNoThe `unverifiable` field of the response.
disqualifyingNoThe `disqualifying` field of the response.
criteria_totalNoThe `criteria_total` field of the response.
evidence_quoteNoThe `evidence_quote` field of the response.
evidence_valueNoThe `evidence_value` field of the response.
criteria_judgedNoThe `criteria_judged` field of the response.
optional_failedNoThe `optional_failed` field of the response.
mandatory_failedNoThe `mandatory_failed` field of the response.
evidence_documentNoThe `evidence_document` field of the response.
evidence_suppliedNoThe `evidence_supplied` field of the response.
missing_documentsNoThe `missing_documents` field of the response.
criteria_unverifiableNoThe `criteria_unverifiable` field of the response.
mandatory_unverifiableNoThe `mandatory_unverifiable` field of the response.
missing_document_countNoThe `missing_document_count` field of the response.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed40 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / applicant_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `applicant_id` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / comparator
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `comparator` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / comparison
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `comparison` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / counts
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `counts` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / criteria
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `criteria` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / criteria_judged
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `criteria_judged` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / criteria_total
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `criteria_total` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / criteria_unverifiable
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `criteria_unverifiable` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / criterion_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `criterion_id` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / description
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `description` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / detail
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Human-readable explanation of the verdict.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / disqualifying
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `disqualifying` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / document
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `document` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / evidence_document
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `evidence_document` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / evidence_quote
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `evidence_quote` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / evidence_supplied
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `evidence_supplied` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / evidence_value
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `evidence_value` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / exception
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `exception` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / expected
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `expected` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / gap
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `gap` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / jurisdiction
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `jurisdiction` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / kind
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `kind` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / mandatory
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `mandatory` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / mandatory_failed
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `mandatory_failed` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / mandatory_unverifiable
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `mandatory_unverifiable` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / met
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `met` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / missing_document_count
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `missing_document_count` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / missing_documents
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `missing_documents` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / not_met
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `not_met` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / optional_failed
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `optional_failed` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / quote
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `quote` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / reason
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Why the verdict was reached.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / status
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / threshold
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `threshold` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / type
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `type` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / unclear
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `unclear` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / unverifiable
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `unverifiable` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / value
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The `value` field of the response.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / verdict
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The decision this tool returned.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "detail",
      +  "verdict"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the description does not need to repeat safety characteristics. It adds a meaningful behavioral detail: the call costs $0.25 USDC. The return-field note is less useful because an output schema exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loads the purpose, but structure is rough: 'grant?.' followed by a lower-case sentence, plus an output-shape note that is redundant given the output schema. The price and sibling distinction earn their place; the 38-field note is less clearly useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only assessment tool with full schema descriptions, annotations, and an output schema, the description supplies the key missing context: the tool's domain, the sibling it replaces for tender checks, and the per-call cost. It is complete enough to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents all five parameters. The description mentions applicant_id but does not add parameter semantics beyond the schema, and the mention of comparator appears to concern output rather than inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific decision verb and resource: whether an applicant is eligible for a grant. It also explicitly distinguishes this from tender eligibility, so an agent can identify the correct tool without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It names `assess_tender_eligibility` as the alternative and gives the condition: use this for grant eligibility, not tender eligibility. This is clear routing guidance, though it does not mention nearby eligibility siblings such as `assess_business_eligibility` or any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.