Sweeppea MCP

get_entry_settings

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get entry page settings for a sweepstakes. Use fetch_sweepstakes first to get the sweepstakes_token. Returns all configuration: display, colors, spacing, entry settings, compliance, confirmation page, winners page, age gate, AMOE, geolocation, analytics, social media follows, sharing rewards, bonus entries, and sponsor profiles. Use this before update_entry_settings to see current values.

get_entry_settings

When to use

Pre-calls required

fetch_sweepstakes if the user gave you a sweepstakes name instead of a token

Parameters to validate before calling

sweepstakes_token (string, required) — The sweepstakes token (UUID format)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`sweepstakes_token`	Yes	The sweepstakes token (UUID format)

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds behavioral context by stating this is a read operation that returns all configuration and is a precursor to updates. No contradictions exist, and the description is consistent with the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat redundant: the initial paragraph and the 'When to use' section repeat the same information verbatim. The 'Parameters to validate' section unnecessarily restates the schema. While the structure with headings is clear, the duplication wastes space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read-only tool with no output schema, the description sufficiently covers return scope by enumerating the many configuration areas (display, colors, compliance, etc.), the required pre-call, and its role before updating. It lacks error handling details but is complete for its simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already covers 100% of the single parameter with a clear description. The tool description adds value by explaining that the token comes from fetch_sweepstakes and is a required pre-call, enriching the parameter's origin and usage beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get entry page settings for a sweepstakes.' It lists the extensive set of configuration categories returned, distinguishing it from sibling tools like update_entry_settings (which modifies) and fetch_sweepstakes (which fetches sweepstakes data, not settings).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly instructs to use fetch_sweepstakes first to obtain the sweepstakes_token and to use this tool before update_entry_settings to see current values. This provides clear when-to-use guidance and a required pre-call, fully addressing usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Sweeppea MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools follow a clear resource+action pattern (fetch_* for lists, get_* for single items, create/update/delete for writes), making them distinguishable. A few near-overlaps exist (fetch_billing_transactions vs fetch_wallet_transactions, draw_winners vs schedule_drawing) but the descriptions clarify the boundaries.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tool names consistently use snake_case verb_noun, with fetch_ for list operations and get_ for single-item retrieval. Some verb variation (add_participant, count_participants, draw_winners, schedule_drawing) deviates from the dominant create/fetch/update/delete pattern but remains predictable and readable.

Tool Count1/5

With 83 tools, this is far beyond a well-scoped server (typically 3-15, with 25+ considered too many). Even though the platform has broad functionality, the sheer number of tools creates significant agent confusion and selection overhead.

Completeness4/5

The sweepstakes domain is thoroughly covered: lifecycle management, participants, groups, rules, drawings, winners, calendar, notes, todos, tickets, surveys, invoices, billing, files, and entry settings. A few minor gaps exist (e.g., no general participant field update, no archive action) but the surface is remarkably complete for its scope.

Resources

Need Help?