Skip to main content
Glama

Compare Superset with a competitor

compare_with
Read-only

Compare Superset with another coaching app, e.g. Trainerize or TrueCoach. Returns the compare page's feature table, how each app handles a coach's tasks, and both sides' prices, each with its source URL and check date.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "competitor": "<competitor>"
    },
    "name": "compare_with"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
competitorYesThe competitor's name, e.g. 'Trainerize'

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already establish readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the description does not need to repeat safety details. It adds valuable behavioral context by describing the returned comparison content, including feature tables, coach-task handling, prices, source URLs, and check dates.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short, front-loaded sentences with no wasted wording. It states the purpose first and then efficiently summarizes the returned data.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter, read-only tool with no output schema, the description is nearly complete: it explains the comparison scope and the returned data with provenance. Minor gaps remain around unsupported competitor behavior or fallback cases, but those are not critical for this simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the competitor parameter is already documented in the schema. The description adds example values such as Trainerize and TrueCoach but does not provide additional syntax or validation rules beyond what the schema supplies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: it compares Superset with another coaching app and returns feature, task-handling, and pricing details. It is clearly distinct in substance from siblings like get_pricing or get_page, though it does not explicitly name those alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly defines usage by saying it compares Superset with another coaching app, which is enough to infer when to call it. It does not explicitly state when to prefer get_pricing or get_page instead, nor does it mention exclusions or unsupported competitors.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources