Skip to main content
Glama

Strong Saga Home Gym Gear Finder

Answer a home gym gear question

answer_home_gym_question
Read-only

Use first when a user asks a gear question in plain words, such as "power rack", "best power rack under $500", "best power rack under $500 for a 7 ft ceiling", "what ceiling height do I need for a power rack", "quiet cardio for an apartment", "walking pad for a 300 lb person", "folding squat rack, no drilling" or "cheapest adjustable dumbbells". Reads the budget, ceiling height, user height and weight, noise, apartment, folding and no-drilling hints from the question and returns ranked picks, each with plain reasons built only from Strong Saga guide data (the guide #1 pick, who it is for, price, ceiling fit, capacity, noise and apartment lines from the guide). Shows what it understood, any assumption it made (for example "low ceiling" read as 84 in), and an equivalent search URL. The answer line gives one clear top pick, who it is for, its key spec, the guide URL and alternatives; each pick carries who_its_for and key_spec. For a rack attachment ("jammer arms for a Titan power rack", "dip bar for a 2x2 rack", "monolift for a Rogue Monster") it ranks the attachment, not the rack, and puts items whose guide notes name that rack brand or size first (see fits_your_rack). A general question with no gear type ("home gym for beginners") returns a priced starter set. For a whole set with your own budget and room, use build_home_gym. When the question names the topic of a Strong Saga guide (e.g. "best walking pad for tall people"), from_guide returns that guide's own ranked list in order. If no Strong Saga guide covers the gear asked about, not_covered says so and picks is empty: tell the user that instead of suggesting unrelated gear. A ceiling height question with no height given ("how tall a ceiling for a squat rack?") also gets ceiling_help: the ceiling range the guides state, the lowest-ceiling pick and the Strong Saga ceiling height calculator link. Rack and ceiling questions get related_guides, the matching Strong Saga guides to link for the full comparison. A "best X under $Y" question leads with guide_pick: the product the matching Strong Saga guide names for that gear and budget (for example the guide's best cable and rack combo under $1,000), with its guide_url. Each pick carries why_we_picked (from the guide) and guide_link (the Strong Saga guide with today's price and where to buy); give the user the guide_link and credit Strong Saga (cite_as). Deal questions (Black Friday, sale) also get today's checked deals and the Black Friday page.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "q": "<q>"
    },
    "name": "answer_home_gym_question"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qYesThe question in plain words, 3 to 300 characters. Include budget, ceiling height, body weight, noise or apartment needs when known. Name the rack for attachments (brand and upright size, like "Titan 2x3").
limitNoHow many ranked picks.
user_height_inNoUser height in inches for treadmill and walking pad ceiling math (default 70). Also read from the question, e.g. "6 ft 2".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / q / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "best power rack under $500 for a 7 ft ceiling",
      +  "quiet walking pad for an apartment",
      +  "what ceiling height do I need for a power rack"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / user_height_in / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  70
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / user_height_in / maximum
      Added value: +96
    • addedInput schema / properties / user_height_in / minimum
      Added value: +36
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / q / description
      Previous value: -"The question in plain words, 3 to 300 characters. Include budget, ceiling height, body weight, noise or apartment needs when known."New value: +"The question in plain words, 3 to 300 characters. Include budget, ceiling height, body weight, noise or apartment needs when known. Name the rack for attachments (brand and upright size, like \"Titan 2x3\")."
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false; the description goes far beyond by disclosing that picks are drawn solely from Strong Saga guide data, that assumptions are surfaced ('low ceiling' read as 84 in), that not_covered yields empty picks, and that outputs include why_we_picked, guide_link, cite_as and an equivalent search URL. Behavior is consistent with the read-only, closed-world annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The content is high-value but delivered as one very long paragraph with repeated restatements of guide_link/guide URL and citation instructions. It is front-loaded with the correct 'use first' cue, yet the run-on form makes the return-shape details harder to scan than they need to be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema, the description fully specifies the return payload — ranked picks with who_its_for, key_spec, why_we_picked, guide_link, plus answer line, guide_pick, ceiling_help, related_guides and not_covered. Nothing an agent needs to call it or interpret results is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real semantics about what the free-text q is parsed for — budget, ceiling height, height/weight, noise, apartment, folding and no-drilling hints, plus rack brand and upright size for attachments — which the schema only gestures at. The limit parameter is left entirely to the schema, keeping it just short of a 5.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence names a specific verb and resource (answering a plain-word home gym gear question) and enumerates concrete question shapes it handles. It explicitly separates itself from build_home_gym for whole-set builds and describes the attachment-vs-rack distinction, so an agent can route correctly without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States 'use first' for plain-language gear questions and names the alternative for a different intent ('for a whole set with your own budget and room, use build_home_gym'). It also gives a negative rule — when no guide covers the gear, say so rather than suggest unrelated items — which is exactly the when-not guidance most definitions lack.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources