Skip to main content
Glama

Subscribe to Declassified topic

subscribe_declassified_topic
Read-onlyIdempotent

Resolve a podcast-feed URL the user can paste into Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Pocket Casts, or Spotify to receive every new Declassified case automatically. Also returns a JSON episodes_url the agent can poll, plus a matched_so_far count of cases that already mention the topic. Read-only — does NOT store the user's email or any PII; the RSS feed is the subscription. Public — no auth required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailNoOptional — informational only; no row is written for it.
topicYesTopic the listener wants alerts for (e.g. 'UAP', 'JFK', 'COINTELPRO').

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint are false. The description adds value by explaining the specific behavior: it returns episodes_url and matched_so_far, does not store email/PII, and requires no auth. This goes beyond annotations and accurately reflects the tool's behavior with no contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (four sentences) with a clear front-loaded main action. Every sentence contributes essential information: main action, returned data, read-only nature, and auth requirement. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (2 parameters, no output schema), the description fully covers what the tool does, what it returns, and its behavior. It explains the output components (feed URL, episodes_url, matched_so_far) and clarifies that it is read-only and public. Complete for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for both parameters. The description adds that the email parameter is 'informational only; no row is written for it,' which is already implied by the schema description. This adds minimal new meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb ('resolve') and the resource ('podcast-feed URL') for Declassified cases. It distinguishes from siblings like 'subscribe_topic' by focusing on Declassified content and detailing output components (feed URL, episodes_url, matched_so_far).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states when to use this tool (for RSS subscription to Declassified cases) and clarifies that it is read-only, public, and does not store PII. It does not explicitly mention when not to use it or alternatives, but the context is clear enough for an agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is overlap between `get_my_private_feed`, `subscribe_topic`, and `list_subscriptions`—all return or manage feed URLs, which could confuse an agent. Otherwise, categories like publisher, fund manager, and search tools are clearly separated.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools use consistent snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., `get_article`, `search_articles`, `publisher_upload_audio`). Exceptions like `digest` are single-word verbs but still fit the pattern. No mixed conventions are present.

Tool Count2/5

With 37 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold considered 'too many' by the rubric. While the broad scope (news, podcasting, publishing, fund management, embedding) justifies a large surface, the count still adds cognitive load and would benefit from splitting into separate servers.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the major domains: search, retrieval, subscriptions, publishing, fund manager operations, and embedder network. Minor gaps exist, such as the absence of an unsubscribe or delete-episode tool, but the core workflows are well-supported and agents can accomplish most tasks.

Resources